U.S. Treasury to oppose development bank financing for most fossil fuel projects. Also moves toward energy efficiency and clean electrification.

August 16, 2021, Reuters, by David Lawder

The U.S. Treasury building is seen in Washington, September 29, 2008. REUTERS/Jim Bourg

The U.S. Treasury building is seen in Washington, September 29, 2008. REUTERS/Jim Bourg

WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department issued new energy financing guidance to multilateral development banks on Monday, saying the United States would oppose their involvement in fossil fuel projects except for some downstream natural gas facilities in poor countries.

The new guidance from the Treasury, the largest shareholder in major development banks including the World Bank Group and the African Development Bank, prioritizes financing for renewable energy options and “to only consider fossil fuels if less carbon-intensive options (are) unfeasible.”

Treasury said in the guidance it would “strongly oppose” coal energy projects across the entire coal value chain from mining, transport to power generation.

But the guidance offered an endorsement of the Asian Development Bank’s work to organize and develop a plan to acquire coal-fired power plants and shut them down early. The effort, first reported by Reuters, includes British insurer Prudential, lenders Citi and HSBC and BlackRock Real Assets, with ambitions for an initial purchase in 2022. read more

The Treasury said it would support multilateral development bank support for coal decommissioning projects, adding: “We are encouraging the MDBs to explore potential projects for coal decommissioning.”

The new guidance follows a meeting of development bank heads convened by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in July, where she asked them to rapidly align MDB portfolios with the 2015 Paris Agreement and develop ambitious plans to mobilize private capital to fight climate change.

The guidance, aimed at helping the banks meet those goals, also said that Treasury will oppose oil energy projects from exploration to the processing of transport fuels. It would make exceptions to this guidance only in “rare circumstances” such as humanitarian crises or as backup generation for clean “off-grid” energy systems.

The Treasury said it would oppose “upstream” natural gas projects, such as exploration, but could support midstream and downstream natural gas projects in poor countries that meet the World Bank’s International Development Association targets if they meet certain other criteria.

These include a credible analysis that there is not an economically or technically feasible renewable energy alternative and that the project has significant positive impact on energy security or development.Reporting by David Lawder in Washington Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Matthew Lewis


Biden wants a national efficiency standard. Would it work?

By Lesley Clark | 08/16/2021 E&E News

President Biden has backed a national energy efficiency standard, but it’s unclear if the concept has traction. AP Photo/Evan Vucci

During his 2020 campaign, President Biden began pitching an energy efficiency and clean electricity standard to push the United States to carbon-free electricity by 2035 — a target now being weighed in Congress.

Biden repeated his support for the dual-standard approach in a tweet two weeks ago, noting the need to act to curb the effects of climate change that “Americans across the country can see and feel.”

But his administration has not offered details on the energy efficiency part, and it’s unlikely to be included in the Senate version of a clean electricity standard (CES) — now called a clean electricity payment program — that supporters hope to include in the sweeping $3.5 trillion Democratic budget resolution unveiled last week.

The omission is frustrating advocates who say an efficiency standard could help slash emissions significantly and reduce the demand for energy.

We see an efficiency standard as well as a clean electricity standard as peanut butter and jelly: It’s hard to imagine one without the other,” said Steven Nadel, executive director of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, which recently issued a policy brief to make the case for a federal efficiency standard alongside a clean electricity standard. “It’s a powerful strategy to help meet emissions goals.”

Nadel published an additional blog post last week saying a national efficiency standard would cut carbon emissions more than what is released annually from all U.S. passenger vehicles.

Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia already have energy efficiency standards that require utilities to save energy through programs for consumers. The council says the standards save enough electricity each year to power 2 million homes.

However, efficiency standards have run into opposition in some states, and it’s unclear how such a plan would fare nationally.

Devin Hartman, director of energy and environmental policy at the free-market focused R Street Institute, said state initiatives have been controversial when applied to commercial operations, with industrial and large commercial users pushing back because they see them as eliminating a competitive edge.

“There’s a very diverse framework out there,” said Hartman, who has worked at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. “A lot of the performance has varied widely, everything from being highly cost-effective to very ineffective.”

In Congress, the focus is on other aspects. ACEEE is talking with lawmakers in both chambers, Nadel said, and is hopeful that an efficiency standard could be wrapped into the reconciliation legislation or passed separately. Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) told E&E News that he will push for the provision in the House version. Biden included both standards in his campaign literature and in the $2 trillion infrastructure plan that he introduced in March.

“Biden was right to include this in his plan, but Congress needs to work on the details and pass it,” Nadel said.

But advocates of a clean electricity standard emerging in the Senate — even as they support efficiency measures — say it would be difficult to combine the two provisions. That’s partly because of strict rules that govern the filibuster-proof reconciliation process Democrats are using to pass the legislation. But more significantly, they say it would be difficult to combine the two as one policy, particularly since the 2035 zero-carbon goal is so ambitious.

We’ve got to fundamentally transform the power sector,” said Sam Ricketts, co-director of the climate group Evergreen Action, which helped develop the clean electricity standard that Senate Democrats have embraced. “Energy efficiency is an important goal, but it is a different goal than driving forward to all carbon-free power generation.” Ricketts said that allowing utilities to credit energy efficiencies could result in “inadvertently undermining” the need to press forward on carbon-free electricity.

“We’re trying to get utilities to reduce their polluting resources and increase their clean resources,” Ricketts said. Awarding credit for efficiency gains could offset gains from cutting the use of polluting sources or generating more clean energy, he said.

“It’s an important goal in itself,” Ricketts said of energy efficiency. “But it cannot displace the critically important goal that a CES has of transforming from 60 percent polluting resources today to just 20 percent by 2030, on the route to zero by 2035.”

Similarly, Bianca Majumder, a policy analyst for energy and environment policy at the Center for American Progress, has advocated for a national energy efficiency standard, but said some recent modeling by Evergreen Action and others suggests it would be “impossible to connect the two regulatory structures as a singular policy” because the goal is to create a faster path to clean energy.

“We need to expand the grid, but we can’t do one coherent standard with both,” she said. “It comes down to how much we are promoting clean energy versus reducing emissions.”

A clean standard and an energy efficiency provision were combined in the sweeping Waxman-Markey climate change bill in 2009 that failed to pass the Senate. At the time, some Republican members of Congress questioned whether a national standard would be difficult to implement through federal agencies and said such an approach could raise energy costs for consumers.

Majumder also said the new goal is an even faster pivot to clean energy than a decade ago.

Crediting utilities for energy efficiency could cut into a path to 100 percent, she said, because it requires focusing on energy generation and deployment.

Some Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.), are leaning toward an incentive-based clean electricity mandate they believe will hasten the transition to clean energy as well as meet the rigid Senate rules for legislation they hope to pass with a simple majority vote.

Though the CES may not include an efficiency standard, Smith — who in 2019 introduced legislation to establish a national energy efficiency standard — said it would encourage efficiency nonetheless.

“Energy efficiency is one of the most powerful tools for reducing emissions — and it can also save consumers and companies serious money,” Smith told E&E News. She noted that the larger budget resolution also contains efficiency measures, including her bid to boost retrofitting for schools and public buildings as well as consumer rebates for home electrification and weatherization.

Majumder also said the CES is pro-energy efficiency because utilities that employ energy efficiency would be able to meet their targets more quickly, and utilities would be able to use incentives they receive on energy efficiency initiatives.

“We’re going to need to do both,” she said of electricity and efficiency standards. “We’re going to need to expand the grid, but also manage the load. It’s really important.”

The provision could, however, make it into the House version. That chamber is expected to cut its recess short and return Aug. 23 to take up the budget resolution and Welch, the Vermont Democrat, said he wants to see the standards combined.

“As a policy, it’s proven to be extraordinarily effective,” Welch said of state energy efficiency standards, arguing that states that have adopted them have four times as much the energy savings as those that have not. “The goal is to reduce carbon emissions as quickly as possible with all ways to help achieve that.”

Welch said he’s aware of the restrictions the Senate faces in passing legislation with a razor-thin Democratic majority, but said there is considerable support in the House for melding the provisions.

“We’re all on the same page here on the Biden and Democratic side: maximum carbon reductions,” he said. “Obviously, there are certain political challenges … but policywise, this really makes sense, and I’m going to do all I can to include it.”

Welch, who last December filed legislation to create a national renewable energy and energy efficiency standard, said he would back a stand-alone efficiency standard, as well.

“My view is by any means possible,” he said.

The “Clean Electricity Payment Program” called for in the budget resolution released by Senate Democrats charges the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee with writing the language.

It would essentially deliver direct payments to utilities that deploy a certain amount of clean energy and levy penalties on those that do not.

Smith told E&E News that the program would be “designed to make the incentives so powerful that utilities choose not to pay the fee because of the benefit of getting incentives.”

The White House did not comment on the standards, though Biden and other administration officials, including Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and White House national climate adviser Gina McCarthy, have called a clean energy standard essential to their efforts to tackle climate change.

State fights

At the state level, Texas in 1999 under then-Gov. George W. Bush (R) became the first to adopt an energy efficiency resource standard (EERS), according to data collected by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The plans generally require utilities to achieve energy savings targets based on the amount of electricity or natural gas sold in the state. They involve customer-focused energy efficiency programs, such as discounts on efficient appliances and equipment and technical assistance.

Virginia in 2020 became the latest state to adopt a standard when its Legislature passed a sweeping clean energy package.

Although most states in recent years have updated or expanded their energy efficiency policies, the National Conference of State Legislatures noted that Florida and Indiana have run into roadblocks.

Indiana’s energy efficiency standards went into effect in 2009, but the state became the first to repeal them in 2014, said Kerwin Olson, executive director of the Citizens Action Coalition, which supported the efficiency measure.

A “strong aversion to mandates” and opposition from utilities and the industrial sector contributed to the demise of the measure, which was signed into law by former Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, Olson noted.

“It wasn’t passed by some left-leaning environmentalist; it was passed by Gov. Daniels, who recognized the benefits of energy efficiency,” Olson said.

The Indiana Energy Association, which said at the time that it did not sponsor the repeal but supported it, said utilities could still continue voluntary energy efficiency programs.

But supporters say the state programs are more effective because they impose must-reach targets. According to the ACEEE, states with efficiency requirements experience an average of four times the level of electricity savings from utility programs compared with states without them. It found that in 2019, the standards saved consumers an additional 22 billion kilowatt-hours.

“For the most part, they’ve done pretty well, and consumers tend to like them,” ACEEE’s Nadel said of state efficiency measures. “We see this as one of the bigger things Congress can do to meet climate goals.”


California greenlights first-of-its-kind energy code to encourage electrified buildings

Utility Dive, Aug. 12, 2021 by Kavya Balaraman

Mario Tama via Getty Images
  • The California Energy Commission (CEC) adopted energy efficiency standards for newly constructed and renovated buildings that stakeholders say are the country’s first statewide building code that strongly incentivizes all-electric construction.
  • The 2022 Energy Code approved by the commission includes elements that encourage electric heat pump technology for space and water heating, expands solar and battery storage standards, and adopts electric-ready requirements for single-family homes.
  • “California’s new building energy code takes a major step toward a future where we have healthy fossil-free homes and buildings for all,” Denise Grab, a manager with RMI’s Carbon-Free Building team, said. While the code doesn’t go as far as some clean energy groups had pushed for, “it’s a big step in the right direction,” Grab added.

The CEC’s 2022 code update is part of a three-year cycle in which the commission adopts standards to increase the energy efficiency and lower the emissions produced by buildings in California. The code is now headed to the California Building Standards Commission and, if approved by that agency, will come into effect at the beginning of 2023. 

The 2022 Energy Code is the product of multiple stakeholder meetings, workshops and more than 300 public comments, according to the CEC. The “star” of the 2022 Energy Code, said Will Vicent, a manager at the CEC’s Building Standards Office, is heat pumps. 

“Used in the right applications, electric heat pumps provide substantial increases in energy efficiency, drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and provide opportunities for load flexibility — all while being cost comparable to other prevalent systems in the market,” Vicent said. 

The update adopted by the CEC would include heat pumps as a performance standard baseline for water or space heating in single-family homes, and space heating in multi-family homes, as well as certain commercial buildings, Vicent said. In addition, it would adopt “electric-ready” requirements for single-family homes, meaning they would need to have dedicated circuits and other infrastructure that would easily enable electric appliances to be installed in the future.

The CEC estimates that the 2022 Energy Code will result in $1.5 billion in consumer benefits over the next three decades, as well as reducing 10 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions. 

RMI and other stakeholders have been urging the CEC to set energy standards that would effectively require all new buildings in the state to be built with electric appliances, Grab said. While the CEC didn’t end up going that far, its approved code update is still a significant development, she added — as the first statewide building code that incentivizes all-electric construction to this extent, it sets the bar for other states’ ambitions, and “it can really set off an avalanche,” she explained.

Other stakeholders agreed. In putting together the 2022 Energy Code, the commission managed to thread the needle of legal authority, market readiness and customer choice “and come out the other end with what will be, if adopted, the strongest state decarbonization code in the country,” said Panama Bartholomy, executive director of the Building Decarbonization Coalition, at the CEC’s meeting on Wednesday. 

The move was also welcomed by state utilities, including Southern California Edison, which filed a letter with the commission this week voicing its support for the standards. In addition, SCE urged regulators to consider a 2025 code update that will “fully electrify new construction in order to accelerate efforts needed to be on a path to achieve California’s 2030 decarbonization target.”

“We welcome the opportunity to support the California Energy Commission’s efforts to advanced efficient, all-electric new construction when it is feasible and cost-effective,” Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) spokesperson Lynsey Paulo said in an emailed statement.

In terms of the impact of additional electrification on the grid, Paulo said PG&E continuously forecasts load in its service area and implements upgrades to the distribution grid to meet demand.

“PG&E fully expects to meet the needs that all-electric buildings will require,” Paulo added. 

“Fighting climate change requires the widespread adoption of multiple strategies and technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – everything from stronger building codes and transportation electrification to energy storage and hydrogen innovations,” San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) said in a statement.