December 2020, DeSmog – The U.S. oil and gas industry is still producing large amounts of oil and gas by fracking — and it continues to lose money doing it. The companies that are doing this have taken on large amounts of debt to make this happen.
Paying off debt is also made more difficult when there are fewer and fewer strong producing sites. As DeSmog has detailed, in the past decade the fracking industry drilled and fracked most of the best oil producing acreage. And right now the industry is only producing from its highest producing areas — an approach known as high grading. But in the Bakken there aren’t many of the best wells left (and the trend is that wells are becoming less productive across the various shale plays in the U.S., including the Bakken). Effectively, with less promising sites, less oil and gas is extracted and fewer profits can be made to pay off corporate debt. In the case of Continental, once its high grading options run out, there is only one way for the industry to go, according to Seeking Alpha: “Beyond this year, it [Continental] will most likely see a continued trend of well performance deterioration, which will not be a welcome trend given the added pressure of more debt that is now accumulating and will have to be serviced.”
In October, Lynn Helms, director of North Dakota’s Mineral Resources Department, has said that oil prices would have to be $55 a barrel for anyone to drill a new oil well in the Bakken. Oil prices have so far risen recently to nearly $50 a barrel, but with the pandemic still keeping the pressure on oil demand, it is unlikely that prices are headed much higher in the next year. Many predictions expect low oil prices for several years with prices not returning to $55 a barrel until 2023 — which would very likely cause many more shale company bankruptcies.
All of this comes at the cost of our environment. The industry was unleashed on the U.S. without proper regulations. This has resulted in it greatly contributing to methane emissions. Methane’s climate impact is 85 times that of carbon dioxide over a 20 year period. Beyond the leakage and flaring impacts, the industry also produces radioactive waste which, due to the lack of regulations, has led to improper disposal of the waste, causing widespread contamination in North Dakota and Pennsylvania. And beyond all of that damage, the U.S. oil and gas industry is facing a bill of another quarter trillion dollars for the cleanup of old oil and gas wells. This cost is being passed on to the public as states and local municipalities are footing the bill for cleanup, rather than being paid for by the industry.
Unlike traditional oil and gas production, the cost to produce fracked oil and gas was more than what the market was willing to pay for it (even with all the freeloading described above). As a result, the U.S. fracking industry has lost over $300 billion. Fracking was supposed to be the future of the U.S. oil and gas industry — instead it has dealt the industry a major financial blow which has likely sped up the energy transition away from oil and gas towards a lower carbon future. Fracking’s legacy will be that it made fracking company executives very wealthy as they lost hundreds of billions of investor money while poisoning the climate and environment and leaving the cleanup bill for the American public. Even the Wall Street Journal finds it isn’t worth it.
Image: Increases in U.S. flared and vented natural gas Credit: EIA
By Justin Mikulka • Tuesday, December 22, 2020 DeSmog https://www.desmogblog.com/2020/12/22/fracking-boom-revolution-oil-gas-industry
After over a decade of the much-hyped U.S. fracking miracle, the U.S. oil and gas industry is having to deal with years of losses and falling asset values which has dealt the industry a serious financial blow. This is despite the fracking revolution delivering record oil and gas production for the past decade, peaking in 2019.
While the pandemic has hurt the industry, companies have also benefited from excessive bailouts from pandemic relief programs but these bailouts are a stop gap financial band-aid for the struggling industry.
The oil and gas industry has always required huge amounts of money to explore for and produce oil and gas but up until now the industry made returns on those investments
The industry made a huge bet on fracking shale deposits to unleash the oil and gas reserves in that shale. It worked from a production standpoint; the industry produced record amounts of oil and gas. The difference is that, unlike traditional oil and gas production, the cost to produce fracked oil and gas was more than what the market was willing to pay for it. As a result, the U.S. fracking industry has lost over $300 billion. Fracking was supposed to be the future of the U.S. oil and gas industry — instead it has dealt the industry a major financial blow which has likely sped up the energy transition away from oil and gas towards a lower carbon future.
The Losses Are Staggering
In April 2018, while many were predicting a bright financial future for the U.S. fracking industry, DeSmog started a series on the finances of the fracking industry with the article, The Secret of the Great American Fracking Bubble. This article highlighted the huge losses by the U.S. fracking industry, which were around a quarter trillion dollars at the time.
More than two years later the Washington Post ran an article on “Shale’s Bust” and updated the losses to-date to be $300 billion — noting that while the pandemic made things worse, “the sector’s weaknesses extend back many years.”
In late 2019, before the pandemic hit, Chevron wrote off $11 billion, the majority of which was related to gas fracking assets. This trend continued in the industry in 2020 with historic write-downs of the industry’s remaining fracking assets, and in June, accounting firm Deloitte estimated the industry could soon write off $300 billion more.
This is what the fracking revolution has done to the U.S. oil and gas industry: financial devastation.
Deloitte released an analysis of the industry finances in mid-2020 and Deloitte Vice President Duane Dickson told CNBC that “a wave of impairments may prompt the deepest consolidation the industry has ever seen over the next six to 12 months.” (Impairments are another way to refer to write-downs of asset values that must be reported as losses by the company.)
This historic contraction of the U.S. oil and gas industry is directly linked to the fracking revolution and the damage is likely to be permanent — and the companies that survive this round of bankruptcies will be saddled with huge debts, making it even harder to build future growth or positive cash flow.
Exxon’s Struggles
The financial hit the fracking industry has taken from over a decade of poor investments is taking a particular toll on one major company: ExxonMobil. In 2009, the company held the title as the largest gas producer in the U.S. It used to be America’s most valuable company. But in August, Exxon was dropped from the Dow Industrial Average. And in December the oil giant made a list of America’s “Zombie” companies — companies that are borrowing more money than they make.
It started a decade ago, when Exxon was producing natural gas but wanted to get into the shale gas boom driven by fracking. This idea led to Exxon’s $41 billion acquisition of XTO, a shale gas fracking company. With the acquisition, Exxon bet big on the future financial potential of the U.S. shale gas industry. A bet that turned out to be one of the worst investments in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry.
“[W]hat they did not foresee was that the success of fracking ultimately would lead to an oversupply that made the purchase price [for XTO] seem high looking backward,” Phil Flynn, Price Futures Group analyst, explained to S&P Global in 2019.
The success of fracking at producing large amounts of oil and gas is also what drove down prices for oil and gas. Fracking didn’t make money when oil and gas was at much higher prices but once prices dropped, the losses accelerated.
“If you’d said four years ago, ‘I’ve got a great investment idea for you — take half your money, burn it, take the other half of your money and put it under a mattress’… it would have been a terrible idea, a terrible investment strategy — except that it would have done better than the U.S. oil & gas industry has done over the last four years,” Clark Williams-Derry, analyst for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), explained at an energy conference in late 2020.
Exxon’s acquisition of XTO is a prime example of how the oil and gas industry’s drive for ever-greater profits blinded it to the reality of the finances of fracking.
But Exxon’s example also illustrates how fracking has been great at two things.
The first is unlocking huge amounts of natural gas and oil from shale deposits. And those oil wells also produce a lot of gas (known as associated gas), even though the oil companies don’t want it. This lack of value for associated gas has led to producers simply burning it (flaring) or venting it into the atmosphere.
Too much fracked gas pushed gas prices down. In mid-2019 prices for U.S. natural gas in Texas went below zero because more gas was being produced than could be sold. To address this market imbalance the oil producers would have to stop drilling more oil wells — that are responsible for the associated gas — something producers are unwilling to do.
The second thing fracking has proven to be great at is destroying investor capital. The industry has lost over $300 billion dollars in the past decade.
In November, Exxon announced it would write down $20 billion of its XTO investment. And there is likely more to come as early estimates were that the write-down would be for $30 billion. Some financial analysts have even accused Exxon of fraud for failing to accurately write down the XTO assets. When companies fail to accurately write down the value of assets, it can mislead investors to the true financial risks the company faces in the future, which can be a form of financial fraud.
Rex Tillerson, CEO of Exxon when it acquired XTO, commented on that deal last year saying, “We probably paid too much.”
But the same thing could be said for the majority of money invested in fracking in the U.S. Even investment legend Warren Buffett got lured into investing $10 billion in Occidental’s 2019 acquisition of Permian producer Anadarko — a deal on the scale of Exxon’s takeover of XTO and perhaps equally, if not more, financially devastating.
Overpayment for fracking assets in the U.S. has financially crippled the U.S. oil and gas industry. In August, Exxon announced it was stopping contributions to its employee compensation plan. In October, Exxon announced it was cutting 15 percent of its global workforce. At the same time, Exxon borrowed another $23 billion in 2020.
And it’s not just Exxon that has taken a hit. A decade ago, Chesapeake Energy was the second largest gas producer in the U.S. behind Exxon. Chesapeake existed because of the success of fracking for methane (natural gas) in the U.S.; the company’s CEO, Aubrey McClendon, was paid $100 million in 2009.
But now, in 2020, Chesapeake Energy’s title of “shale pioneer” is making headlines due to the company’s bankruptcy.
While Exxon and Chesapeake Energy are some of the larger examples of companies to succumb to the fracking revolution’s over-hype, the industry is in the midst of a rash of bankruptcies, and the long-term damage to the industry is far from over.
Pinning Hopes to LNG
Many of the big problems facing the fracking industry can be linked to gas as opposed to the record oil production that resulted from the fracking boom.
The industry was right about fracking’s potential to produce natural gas. And Wall Street was happy to loan the money to make it happen. Meanwhile, many executives got rich in the process.
When Exxon bought XTO it bet big on higher future natural gas prices. But Exxon produced too much gas — along with the rest of the fracking industry doing the same. This resulted in gas prices going down. This surge in gas production essentially sabotaged the industry’s own bet on gas prices.
The record production drove down global gas prices to below $2 per million British Thermal Units (MMBtu). Yet, analysts believe the U.S. industry needs minimum prices of $2.50 per MMbtu to break even. November 2020 is the only month where prices were above $2.50/MMBtu in 2020 with prices reaching a low of $1.63 MMbtu in June.
Image: U.S. natural gas prices. Credit: Energy Information Administration
To try and make up for this over-production problem, a few years ago the oil and gas industry came up with a plan. It would take all the excess natural gas and liquefy it and sell that liquefied natural gas (LNG) to the world. This unleashed a huge wave of investment in LNG export terminals with capacity starting to increase rapidly in 2016.
Image: Planned expansion of U.S. LNG export capacity. Source: EIA
But just as happened with the U.S. gas market, the global market was also awash in natural gas and LNG. In January 2020, Bloomberg published the article “Global LNG Poised for Terrible Year as Supply Floods Market” which highlighted the problem.
Prices plummeted in 2020 and investments in American LNG have virtually disappeared in 2020.
Prices for LNG have,however, rebounded in late 2020 due to recent production decreases from major global suppliers like Qatar and Australia as a result of unplanned maintenance and bad weather shutting down exports from Algeria. In response, the U.S. is exporting record amounts to meet this demand, but as prices have risen, some countries have stopped buying.
This current supply shortage is likely a temporary situation due to short-term dynamics but illustrates the price sensitivity facing the natural gas industry. When prices rise too much, there are cheaper alternatives to LNG.
Competition from Renewables
At the same time, cheap renewable energy is out-competing gas.
A new report released in December by industry analysts Wood MacKenzie predicts that “More than 75% of new liquefied natural gas global supply could be at risk due to competition from renewable energy.”
In December, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicted that the share of electricity in the U.S. produced by natural gas would decline “in response to a forecast increase in the price of natural gas delivered to electricity generators.” The EIA predicts that the percentage of U.S. power generated from natural gas could fall from 39 percent in 2020 to 34 percent in 2021 due to a rise in prices. And the EIA predicts renewable energy, and a return to coal in some locations, will replace that market share.
This highlights a fundamental problem facing the gas industry. Current prices are too low for the industry to make money. But when prices rise to levels where the industry could make money, the gas is no longer economically competitive because renewable energy is cheaper right now.
As gas prices rise and renewable energy prices continue to fall, the U.S. gas industry is in a no-win situation.
A recent analysis by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), for instance, found that shale gas producers in the Appalachian region of the U.S. lost another $500 million in the third quarter of 2020.
The U.S. gas industry also is suffering due to the warmer winters the U.S. is experiencing — warmer weather due in part to the burning of fossil fuels and the methane released by the natural gas industry. Warmer weather depresses gas prices because there is less heating demand.
IEEFA, which has been tracking the industry’s decline, recently summed up the reality of what the “shale revolution” has done: “The shale revolution has turned the U.S. into the world’s most prolific gas producer. Yet in financial terms, the gas production boom has been an unmitigated financial bust.”
It’s Not Easy to Pay Off Debt
Despite all of this, to this day, the U.S. oil and gas industry is still producing large amounts of oil and gas by fracking — and it continues to lose money doing it. The companies that are doing this have taken on large amounts of debt to make this happen.
Continental Resources CEO and majority owner Harold Hamm has been one of the most visible proponents of fracking, even inheriting the title of “Shale King” from the previous king of fracking, Aubrey McClendon.
Continental has been the leading producer in North Dakota’s Bakken shale play, and in 2017, Hamm declared that Continental’s policy was “Absolutely no new debt.” But in the second quarter of 2020, investment site Seeking Alpha noted Continental’s debt increased from $5.3 billion to $6 billion, noting that this debt was “unsustainable.” Simply Wall Street, another investing site, concluded in October that “it looks like Continental Resources has too much debt.”
For the last five years Whiting Petroleum has consistently been one of the top producers of oil in the Bakken behind Continental, yet it declared bankruptcy in 2020 because it couldn’t pay off its debt.
Paying off debt is also made more difficult when there are fewer and fewer strong producing sites. As DeSmog has detailed, in the past decade the fracking industry drilled and fracked most of the best oil producing acreage. And right now the industry is only producing from its highest producing areas — an approach known as high grading. But in the Bakken there aren’t many of the best wells left (and the trend is that wells are becoming less productive across the various shale plays in the U.S., including the Bakken). Effectively, with less promising sites, less oil and gas is extracted and fewer profits can be made to pay off corporate debt. In the case of Continental, once its high grading options run out, there is only one way for the industry to go, according to Seeking Alpha: “Beyond this year, it [Continental] will most likely see a continued trend of well performance deterioration, which will not be a welcome trend given the added pressure of more debt that is now accumulating and will have to be serviced.”
Bold Promises
Throughout all of this, companies are making bolder promises while the losses and debt has continued to grow. The industry has consistently asked investors to be patient as profits, they said, were just on the horizon.
Despite claims by Parsley Energy’s CEO Matt Gallagher, or those from the likes of the now bankrupt Whiting Petroleum, that the fracking industry could make money when oil prices were as low as $40 a barrel, and Exxon even saying they could produce fracked oil in the Permian for $15 a barrel, this hasn’t happened.
In October, Lynn Helms, director of North Dakota’s Mineral Resources Department, has said that oil prices would have to be $55 a barrel for anyone to drill a new oil well in the Bakken. Oil prices have so far risen recently to nearly $50 a barrel, but with the pandemic still keeping the pressure on oil demand, it is unlikely that prices are headed much higher in the next year. Many predictions expect low oil prices for several years with prices not returning to $55 a barrel until 2023 — which would very likely cause many more shale company bankruptcies.
No Money to Clean Up Environmental Damage
All of this comes at the cost of our environment. The industry was unleashed on the U.S. without proper regulations. This has resulted in it greatly contributing to methane emissions — and further methane regulations were rolled back in 2020 by the Trump administration. At the same time, new regulations proposed at the state level in New Mexico have major loopholes that exempt the majority of wells in the state and thus are ineffective.
The industry has also vented and flared huge amounts of natural gas, further contributing to climate change and air pollution. Flaring the natural gas creates the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide while venting the natural gas (methane) to the atmosphere without burning it is even worse as methane’s climate impacts can be 85 times that of carbon dioxide over a 20 year period.
Image: Increases in U.S. flared and vented natural gas Credit: EIA
The industry also produces radioactive waste which, due to the lack of regulations, has led to improper disposal of the waste, causing widespread contamination in North Dakota and Pennsylvania. However, regulators decided in 1998 that doing so would have “a severe economic impact on the industry and on oil and gas production in the U.S.” — so rules to properly address the waste issue have not been adopted.
Beyond the leakage and flaring impacts, the industry also produces radioactive waste which, due to the lack of regulations, has led to improper disposal of the waste, causing widespread contamination in North Dakota and Pennsylvania. And beyond all of that damage, the U.S. oil and gas industry is facing a bill of another quarter trillion dollars for the cleanup of old oil and gas wells. This cost is being passed on to the public as states and local municipalities are footing the bill for cleanup, rather than being paid for by the industry.
No Light At the End of the Tunnel
The U.S. fracking revolution hasenjoyed a spectacular run. President Barack Obama rightfully wanted credit for it and President Donald Trump also tried to claim it as his success. Neither publicly acknowledge that it was a financial and environmental disaster.
Fracking’s legacy will be that it made fracking company executives very wealthy as they lost hundreds of billions of investor money while poisoning the climate and environment and leaving the cleanup bill for the American public.
This December, the Wall Street Journal published an article that opened with the following question, “Does investing in oil and gas companies still make sense?”
For many reasons outlined by the Wall Street Journal, the answer to that question for more and more investors is “no.” And that is thanks in large part to the fracking revolution. The oil and gas business has always been cyclical but no one ever questioned its future viability until fracking unleashed ten years of financial devastation on the industry right as the renewable energy industry became a true competitor.
Image: Flaring natural gas in the Permian Credit: Justin Hamel
**
2019 DeSmog
While carbon dioxide — deservedly — gets a bad rap when it comes to climate change, about 40 percent of global warming actually can be attributed to the powerful greenhouse gas methane, according to the 2013 IPCC report. This makes addressing methane emissions critical to stopping additional warming, especially in the near future. Methane is shorter-lived in the atmosphere but 85 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20 year period.
Atmospheric levels of methane stopped increasing around the year 2000 and at the time were expected to decrease in the future. However, they began increasing again in the last 10 years, spurring researchers to explore why. Robert Howarth, a biogeochemist at Cornell University, recently presented his latest research linking the increase in methane to fossil fuel production, with fracking for natural gas, which is mostly methane, likely a major source.
Global Monthly Mean CH4 (Methane) Credit: NOAA Earth System Resource Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division
In a December 14 research presentation in Ithaca, New York, Howarth argued that 3.4 percent of all natural gas produced from shale in the U.S. is leaked throughout the production cycle.
Howarth’s research links the increase in methane to the U.S. production of shale gas via fracking. The beginning of the U.S. fracking boom coincides with the beginning of the rise in methane in the past decade, and a 2018 NASA study linked the industry to this methane spike.
One thing that is becoming increasingly clear about the U.S. fracked oil and gas industry is that it leaks methane — a lot of methane. About 60 percent more methane than previous Environmental Protection Agency estimates, which relied heavily on industry self-reporting, according to a 2018 study published in the journal Science.
Leaks, Venting, and Blowouts
While the oil and gas industry makes claims about wanting to reduce methane leaks, it has been aided by two simple facts that help hide the scale of the problem: Methane is odorless and invisible to the naked eye. Difficult to detect, methane leaks in the oil and gas production system weren’t obvious until people like Sharon Wilson at Earthworks began bringing specialized infrared cameras to production facilities and helped make those leaks visible.
But it isn’t just unintentional leaks. Much of the methane released is intentionally “vented” to the atmosphere in areas without the processing plants, pipelines, and other expensive infrastructure to make use of it.
Recently, Wilson took The New York Times to Texas to document the severity of the situation. When the Times showed the results to Tim Doty, a former senior official at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality who is trained in infrared leak detection, he commented, “That’s a crazy amount of emissions.”
Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute, the largest U.S. oil and gas industry trade group, has been running misleading ads this fall, claiming the industry has reduced emissions even as it successfully lobbied the Trump administration to roll back new regulations designed to reduce methane emissions.
This month,Texans for Natural Gas, the Permian Basin Petroleum Association, and the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association released a report claiming relatively low flaring rates and that “methane emissions intensity” is down for the prolific Permian oil fields. However, according to E&E News, analysts at Rystad Energy reported in November that flaring, or burning, natural gas in the Permian has hit an “all-time high.”
Where are federal regulators? Letting industry self-audit. Susan Bodine, assistant director for EPA enforcement and compliance, said of the need for oil and gas well operators to monitor and control pollutants, “We know it is a widespread problem. We feel the best way to get them back into compliance is for them to do it themselves.”
Two reasons the industry is reluctant to invest in methane emissions reduction equipment and infrastructure in places like Texas — even though it is in the business of selling methane as natural gas — are the oversupply of natural gas produced in America and historically low natural gas prices. This is in large part due to what’s known as “associated gas.”
Associated gas is a byproduct of fracked oil wells. Oil well operators make most of their money selling oil, which fetches a higher price, and either burn off (flare) or release (“vent”) the associated gas into the atmosphere, as the infrared cameras make clear.
At certain points this year, the price for natural gas in Texas went negative. The industry has little economic incentive to stop leaks of a product that has no value.
In addition to the ongoing leaks that are part of daily operations, the oil and gas industry also has experienced accidents resulting in major methane leaks.
The Aliso Canyon methane leak in California in 2015 was the largest documented methane leak in U.S. history, leaking from a natural gas storage facility for 118 days. The scale of the leak was comparable to the annual emissions of half a million cars. According to Thomas Ryerson, a research chemist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the accident was a major step back for the climate. “On the scale of the control efforts that have been put in place to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, it rolls that back years,” he told Smithsonian Magazine.
Along with the infrared cameras that can “see” methane leaks, satellites are now offering another way to track leaks, and the early reports aren’t good. The New York Times reported this week that scientists determined a blown-out gas well in Ohio was a major methane leak — much larger than the well’s owner ExxonMobil had reported.
The oil and gas industry has been able to deny the scale of the methane problem for a long time because outside validation was scarce and few could prove companies weren’t accurately reporting the numbers. These new technologies now allow those outside of industry to quantify the true scale of the methane problem.
Knowing the scale of the problem is one thing, but having regulators who will hold the industry accountable for addressing it is a whole other problem.
Bridge Fuel Propaganda
Natural gas is still a fossil fuel — just like coal and oil — and despite well-funded industry efforts to promote natural gas as a climate solution, its methane problem makes it a major contributor to the climate crisis. The natural gas industry has hailed it as a “bridge fuel” thatoffers a “cleaner” energy option to bridge society’s transition to renewables. Much like the “clean coal” effort, this is nothing more than a marketing campaign to confuse the public and sell natural gas.
Yet the industry gets help in this effort from politicians from both political parties in the U.S. The Obama administration oversaw the massive expansion of fracking over its eight years and promoted the idea of natural gas as a bridge fuel. Former members of Obama’s administration continue to do just that, including former Vice President and current Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden, whose top energy advisor Heather Zichal, after leaving the administration, was appointed to the board of natural gas company Cheniere Energy.
High profile efforts to address climate change have allowed the bridge fuel myth to linger. Former Secretary of State John Kerry recently launched World War Zero, a celebrity-backed initiative to rally “unlikely allies” to respond to the climate emergency. Among those allies are proponents, such as former Ohio governor John Kasich, who are still advocating for natural gas as a bridge fuel. “If I’ve got to sign up to be an anti-fracker, count me out,” Kasich told The New York Times.
As the scale of natural gas’s methane problem becomes even clearer, the idea of natural gas as a “bridge fuel” loses its credibility. Especially when power generation from solar, wind, and battery storage, which are growing rapidly, are already cheaper than coal and competitive with natural gas in many places.
Industry Back to Challenging Science and Misleading the Public
For decades, the oil and gas industry has effectively delayed climate action by misleading the public and funding politicians to do the same by pretending there was a debate about the science. It worked.
The industry is applying the same approach to natural gas. It releases ads with misleading messages saying it has achieved a “60 Percent Reduction in Emissions” (when it’s a reduction in emissions rates in some areas),along with relentless messaging about how natural gas is “clean” and key to fighting global warming.
The oil and gas industry knows it has a methane problem, and a methane problem is inherently a climate problem. But the same industry that sought to sow doubt about climate science is sticking to its proven approach of misleading the public with pretty advertisements and compliant politicians.
However, efforts by activists like Sharon Wilson and scientists like Robert Howarth have revealed the invisible climate bomb that is methane. And that reality has the industry worried.
Scott Sheffield is CEO of Pioneer Resources and a veteran of the fracking industry. He is on the record saying he believes the industry has to stop flaring and venting so much methane. Sheffield sees risk ahead.
“Climate change and investors are the two big challenges,” he told the Wall Street Journal.
Sheffield understands the reality. As the scale of the fracking industry’s methane problem becomes more widely known, the true impact of fracking for oil and gas becomes crystal clear. Burning oil and gas is a significant contributor to climate change, but even before these fossil fuels make it into a car or power plant, we now know that so is simply producing them. https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/12/22/methane-leaks-venting-blowouts-fracking-climate-change
Main image: Methane sign. Credit: Jeremy Buckingham, CC BY 2.0
