The GHG reduction measures the government set out are “not sufficient to ensure that the necessary transition to climate neutrality is achieved in time,” said Germany’s top court.

Germany’s top court has demanded changes to the country’s climate law, reports the Financial Times, saying it places too much of a burden on future generations to reduce carbon emissions. In what the paper describes as a “key victory for young climate campaigners”, the court said the law “violate[s] the freedoms of the complainants, some of whom are still very young” because it “irreversibly offload[s] major emission reduction burdens on to periods after 2030”.

The measures the government had set out for the post-2030 period were “not sufficient to ensure that the necessary transition to climate neutrality is achieved in time”, the court added. In 2019, Germany committed to cutting emissions by 55% by 2030, and has a long-term goal of slashing greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050, says Politico. The government will now have to revise the law by the end of the next year, says BBC News.

The case had been brought by “young environmental activists, backed by Fridays for Future along with Greenpeace, Germany’s Friends of the Earth (BUND) and other NGOs”, says the Guardian. The paper carries the reaction of one activist who said: “Climate protection is not nice to have; climate protection is our basic right and that’s official now. This is a huge win for the climate movement, it changes a lot.” The ruling “could have political repercussions” ahead of the election in September that will choose a new Parliament and a successor to chancellor Angela Merkel, reports the New York Times. It explains: “During her four terms in office, Ms. Merkel sought to highlight the importance of combating climate change, but her governments’ policies often fell short of activists’ demands. The 2019 law was the product of wrangling between Ms. Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats and their partners in government, the center-left Social Democrats, who seized the opportunity of the ruling for positioning themselves ahead of the upcoming campaign.” The paper notes that it is “the Greens, an opposition party, that could benefit most from the ruling given its popularity among young people. The party has seen its support explode recently, with polls showing it in a neck-and-neck race for the lead alongside of the conservatives”. Former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres said the decision made clear the need to “focus on shorter-term mitigation and emission reductions”, reports the Associated Press. And Clean Energy Wire has gathered other reaction to the ruling.


German climate change law violates rights, court rules

BBC April 29, 2021

Climate change protesters wearing masks march in Bonn, Germany, March 2019

Germany’s climate change laws are insufficient and violate fundamental freedoms by putting the burden of curbing CO2 emissions on the young, its highest court has ruled.

It says the law fails to give enough detail on cutting CO2 emissions after current targets end in 2030.

“The provisions irreversibly offload major emission reduction burdens on to periods after 2030,” it found.

The government will now have to revise the law by the end of the next year.

The decision comes a week after the EU unveiled ambitious new climate change targets.

Under the law, which was agreed between member states and the European Parliament, the bloc will cut carbon emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared with 1990 levels.

What does the law say?

Like the EU legislation, Germany’s domestic climate change law provides for a 55% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2030.

The 2019 law was agreed as part of Germany’s response to the 2016 Paris climate deal, which aims to keep the global temperature rise well under 2C – and preferably to 1.5C – to prevent the worst effects of climate change. captionWhat is climate change?

But the German Constitutional Court said on Thursday that current measures “violate the freedoms of the complainants, some of whom are still very young” because they delay too much of the action needed to reach the Paris targets until after 2030.

“In order to achieve this, the reductions still required after 2030 will have to be achieved more urgently and at short notice,” it said.

Should Germany use up most of its permitted CO2 emissions by this time, future generations could face a “serious loss of freedom”.

“Virtually any freedom is potentially affected by these future emission reduction obligations, because almost all areas of human life are still associated with the emission of greenhouse gases and are therefore threatened by drastic restrictions after 2030,” the court said.

How did Germans react?

Thursday’s ruling partially upheld complaints brought by climate change activists – most of them young – and environmental groups between 2018 and 2020.

German climate activist Luisa Marie Neubauer (L) and Jakob Blasel (R) and Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg at a protest in Berlin in 2019
image captionLuisa Neubauer (L) with Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and German activist Jakob Blasel at a protest in Berlin in 2019

German climate activist Luisa Neubauer from the Fridays for Future movement and one of the plaintiffs in the case, described the decision as a “huge win for the climate movement”.

“Today’s inaction mustn’t harm our freedom & rights in the future,” she said.

One of the lawyers involved in the case, Felix Ekardt, hailed the “ground-breaking victory”.

Following the announcement, German organisation Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) tweeted a letter written by an 11-year-old girl (in German) in 2019, which had led to its own involvement in the case. “I would like to take the government to court because the politicians aren’t taking the impending climate catastrophe seriously enough, and I want people in 100 to 150 years to still know what snow is,” the pupil wrote. German Environment Minister Svenja Schulze also welcomed the decision, which she described as “a clear strengthening of climate protection”.

“I would have liked to have included a further interim goal for the 2030s in the [2019] law but at the time there was no majority for that,” she said.

What are other countries doing?

Other countries have also focused on climate change in recent days, with Poland reaching a draft agreement with trade unions to close all of its coal mines by 2049 and organise severance payments for the tens of thousands of workers affected.

Last week, the US hosted a virtual climate summit of 40 global leaders, with President Joe Biden pledging to cut US carbon emissions by 50-52% below 2005 levels by the year 2030.

Meanwhile, the UK announced radical plans to cut carbon emissions by 78% by 2035, although environmentalists warn that the government has consistently failed to achieve previous targets set by its independent Climate Change Committee.