Whom candidates surround themselves with and listen to is crucial. Progressives should look at the structure of candidates’ campaigns: Who is funding them? Who are their advisors? Are they investing in real conversations with voters? We must insist on representatives who will share governing power. Co-governance means that elected officials are actively working with our communities—not corporate lobbyists—to draft policies and to move them forward together.
Lizeth Chacon The 2020 presidential election, for many of us, will be the fight of our lifetime. We need a president who will take bold action on the issues shaping the lives of people in the multiracial working class. That means building an economy that works for and is owned by the 99percent, not the billionaire class; fighting for our immigrant communities; ensuring everyone has guaranteed access to healthcare, housing and education with no corporate profiteers; and facing the climate crisis head on through a just Green New Deal. But while these politicians’ words might sound right, we can’t afford to fall for sound bites. So, whom do we trust? Rather than look to a savior, it’s time to reimagine the relationship between politicians and communities. Elected officials need to treat us not as votes to be won but as partners in governance, beginning on—or long before—the campaign trail. Whom candidates surround themselves with and listen to is crucial. Progressives should look at the structure of candidates’ campaigns: Who is funding them? Who are their advisors? Are they investing in real conversations with voters? We must insist on representatives who will share governing power. Co-governance means that elected officials are actively working with our communities—not corporate lobbyists—to draft policies and to move them forward together.
Updates on Inequality news
An increased minimum wage would benefit nearly 40 million Americans Ten years have passed since Congress raised the federal minimum wage to $7.25 per hour, and it has “lost almost 15 percent of its value to inflation” since then, according to EPI’s David Cooper. Cooper’s latest report analyzes the impacts of the phased-in increases proposed in the Raise the Wage Act of 2019. Using EPI’s Minimum Wage Simulation Model, Cooper shows that increasing the minimum wage to $15 by 2024 would directly and indirectly lift wages for 39.7 million workers—equivalent to 26.6 percent of all U.S. workers. Women and single parents would disproportionately benefit. The wage increases would also help millions of Americans rise above the poverty line. Read the report »
Economists stand in solidarity with low-wage workers Low-wage workers have endured decades of growing economic inequality due to modest and infrequent increases in the minimum wage. More than 100 economists nationwide have signed a letter in support of increasing the federal minimum wage to $15 by 2024, as well as phasing out the subminimum wage for tipped workers—which has been stuck at $2.13 since 1991—and indexing the minimum wage to growth in median wages. The letter details the benefits of raising the minimum wage—not only for low-wage workers and their families, but also for their communities and the economy at large. Read the letter »
Medicare For All bill unveiled: ‘Complete transformation’ of health care. NBC: “As the debate over Medicare For All heats up on the 2020 trail, House progressives are opening a new front in Congress with a detailed single-payer bill that they plan to aggressively push this year. ‘We intend to make sure that Americans across this country know that we are standing up and fighting for them and for health care to be a right and not a privilege,’ Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., the lead sponsor of the bill and co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a call with reporters Tuesday. ‘I think this Medicare For All bill really makes it clear what we mean by Medicare for All,’ she said. ‘We mean a complete transformation of our health care system, we mean a system where there are no private insurance companies that provide these core comprehensive benefits that will be covered through the government.’ If passed, Medicare For All would replace all existing private and public coverage with a more generous version of Medicare that would cover essential medical services, vision, and dental benefits with no premiums, copays, or deductibles. The new bill does not contain provisions to offset its cost, arguably the most contentious topic in the single-payer debate, but Jayapal said they’d work out financing further down the line.”
Insurance stocks plunge as Medicare for All bill unveiled with major Democratic support. Common Dreams: “Support for Medicare for All is rapidly gaining momentum in Congress—and insurance investors are starting to get nervous. Health insurance stocks tanked on Wednesday as Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) introduced comprehensive Medicare for All legislation with the backing of more than 100 House Democrats and major progressive organizations, including America’s largest nurses’ union and national consumer advocacy groups. ‘The S&P 500 Managed Health Care Index plunged as much as 4.9 percent, the most since Dec. 6, led by UnitedHealth Group Inc., Humana Inc., and WellCare Health Plans Inc.,’ Bloomberg reported after Jayapal unveiled her bill during an event on Capitol Hill. ‘Insurers UnitedHealth and Cigna Corp, which also own the country’s largest pharmacy benefit managers, were both down about four percent.’ Jayapal quickly made clear that she has no sympathy for the insurance industry, tweeting in response to the news, ‘Sorry not sorry.’”
Rural America Needs Medicare For All Now Rural America is facing a health care emergency – and Medicare for All is the answer. Hospitals in rural Iowa, where I live, are closing or teetering on the brink of closure at an alarming rate. Over a hundred have shut down since 2005, and hundreds more are on life support. In some counties, they no longer deliver babies. Long-term care facilities are vanishing all across rural America, or being bought up by large corporations who care more about profit than the care of our loved ones. I know firsthand – I’m a registered nurse, and a lifelong Iowan from the country. Medicaid expansion was supposed to improve access to care. But in Iowa, the opposite happened when we passed this in 2013, then handed the entire program over to private, for-profit Managed Care Organizations. What we got in return was less care, more services denied, facilities shuttered, and lives lost to corporate greed. The Medicare for All Act of 2019, presented today by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, offers us an opportunity to fix much of what’s wrong with American health care. Instead of allowing private corporations free rein to decide who has access to care and how much they must pay, this bill puts healthcare decisions back where they belong: in the hands of patients and their care providers, and the financing back into public hands. We’ll actually spend less, and get far better coverage. For this, and so many other reasons, Medicare for All is the prescription America and our rural communities need.
Why wealth equality remains out of reach for black Americans. The Conversation: “Based on data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finance, the typical black family has only 10 cents for every dollar held by the typical white family. While there is no magic bullet for racism, access to wealth, and the security to pass it down from one generation to the next, would go a long way toward changing the economic trajectory for blacks. It is important to note that it was never the case that a white asset-based middle class simply emerged. Rather, it was government policy, and to some extent literal government giveaways, that provided whites the finance, education, land and infrastructure to accumulate and pass down wealth. In contrast, blacks were largely excluded from these wealth generating benefits. When they were able to accumulate land and enterprise, it was often stolen, destroyed or seized by government complicit theft, fraud and terror. In our view, education alone cannot address the centuries-long exclusion of blacks from the benefits of wealth-generating policies and the extraction of whatever wealth they may have. The most just approach would be a comprehensive reparation program that acknowledges these grievances and offers compensatory restitution, including ownership of land and other means of production.”
Flat Broke, Black Voters Want More Than Just Another Black President By Jon Jeter, Truthout.org. Sen. Cory Booker’s announcement on February 1 that he is entering the 2020 presidential race brings the number of African-American Democrats seeking their party’s nomination to two, making the crowded primary field the “most diverse in history,” according to The New York Times. But while The New York Times, cable news and other liberal pundits exult in the White House bids of Booker and California’s junior U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, African Americans, ironically enough, have not uniformly mustered nearly as much enthusiasm for either candidate. “Cory Booker is running for president, y’all,” the popular African-American YouTube blogger… -more-
Student Debt Is At All-Time-High Of Over $1 Trillion By Alexandre Tanzi, Bloomberg.com. More than a decade has passed since young Americans faced debt levels this high. Debt among 19 to 29-year-old Americans exceeded $1 trillion at the end of 2018, according to the New York Federal Reserve Consumer Credit Panel. That’s the highest debt exposure for the youngest adult group since late 2007. Debt levels play a role in how young adults view their spending conditions, according to a University of Michigan survey Friday. Younger adults — those under age 35 — have reduced their spending compared with previous generations possibly because of weakened job prospects, delayed… -more-
The Banality Of Empire By Kenn Orphan, Counterpunch.org. This month freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar questioned Trump’s nominee for envoy to Venezuela, Elliot Abrams. While her interrogation was somewhat tepid in regard to American imperialism (she said “no one disputes” that the US goal has always been to support democracy and defend human rights), she did bring up the role of the US in the massacres in El Salvador in the 1980s. Massacres in which Abrams is implicated. It was also instructive in that it provided a visual to how deeply debased the American political landscape actually is. -more-
What States Can Do To Reduce Poverty And Inequality Through Tax Policy By Sarah Anderson and Chuck Collins, Inequality.org. States have an opportunity to act to close the loopholes that hide and protect the wealth of the top 1%, remedy the impact of the new federal tax law that lowers taxes on the wealthy, and make critical investments in infrastructure, energy systems, and programs that create broader opportunity and shared prosperity. Concentrations of wealth are distorting our economy and undermining our democracy and civic health. State administrations and state legislatures can act to close the loopholes, put a brake on economic inequality and concentrations of wealth, and generate significant revenue. -more-
Sarah Anderson and Chuck Collins, What States Can Do to Reduce Poverty and Inequality Through Tax Policy. State governments have many options for recouping the windfalls large corporations and the wealthy received through the 2017 Republican federal tax law.
Sally Tomlinson and Danny Dorling, The Key to the Brexit Backstory. How did Britain’s wealthy take the end of the British empire? Not well — and the rest of us are still paying the price.
Paul Theobald, Reflections on a Quixotic Bid for Social and Economic Justice. In rural America, a cascade of billionaire dollars is making sure that democracy cannot grow.
Sarah Schulz, Immigrants Aren’t the Emergency. Communities around the U.S. are told to blame immigrants for the burdens of unchecked capitalism. Don’t buy it.
Rebecca Tarlau, What’s Behind the Teacher Strikes: Unions Focus on Social Justice, Not Just Salaries. A new generation of union activists see their struggle as part of the fight for equitable resources for the communities where they teach.
Bob Lord, The Problem With Bernie Sanders’s 77 Percent Estate Tax for Billionaires? It’s Not Enough, Newsweek. The Sanders estate tax proposal has a fighting chance of curtailing the concentration of wealth that’s corroding our democracy, but only if strengthened to tax gifts the same as bequests.
Lynn Parramore, Opioid Crisis Shows How Economic Inequality Kills, Institute for New Economic Thinking. Big Pharma couldn’t do its dirty work without America’s increasing economic inequality.
Jen Doll, Why Does It Feel Like Everyone Has More Money Than You? Harper’s Bazaar. Opening up dialogues around money, privilege, success, and class can be as complex as the threads weaving these four beasts together.
David Gelles, They’re Rich and They’re Mad About Taxes (Too Low!), New York Times. An affluent few are raging against a tax law that puts more money — a lot more — in their pockets.
Jacob Hacker, The Roots of America’s Exceptional Inequality, Yale Insights. A cogent new overview.
John Horgan, Revolt Against the Rich, Scientific American. An uprising long overdue.
Anil Antony and Ankur Prasad, Pay people for data, The Hindu. Seven of the world’s most valuable companies profit off data obtained for free from ordinary people. To nurture a more equal world, that needs to end
America’s billionaires have suddenly realized they just may be facing an existential crisis. A good many Americans, they now understand, would rather billionaires not exist. Our more pugnacious super rich have greeted this growing anti-billionaire sensibility with predictable right-wing scorn. But some daring conservatives are venturing into new ideological territory. They’re using the successes of Scandinavian nations — egalitarian pace-setters like Sweden and Norway — to justify America’s grand private fortunes. These nations, they point out, actually have more billionaires per capita than the United States. How can that be? Sam Pizzigati, author of The Case for a Maximum Wage, has the scoop on the right’s latest rationale for riches.
Max Moran, The Big Wall Street Giveaway the 115th Congress Hopes the 116th Won’t Notice. Despite shifting political tides in the house, Wall Street still has plenty to celebrate.
Tanya Wallace-Gobern, Black Workers Break Through Corporate Silence. Despite corporate censorship, Black workers are collectively challenging racism in the workplace and fighting silence with action and organizing.
Nanette Senters, GM Is Closing My Plant. What Are Politicians Going to Do About It? Senters gave GM 20 years of her life. In return they took her job — and the government keeps rewarding them for it.
Chuck Collins and Jessicah Pierre, The Role of Family Wealth in Reinforcing Generational Divides. An examination of one of the biggest financial riddles of the 30-something years: how can anyone afford to live in increasingly expensive cities?
Gillian Tett, How income inequality affects our mental health, Financial Times. Drastic disparities of wealth hurt rich and poor alike.
Joe Pinsker, The ‘Hidden Mechanisms’ That Help Those Born Rich to Excel in Elite Jobs, Atlantic. The “bank of mom and dad” and much more.
Jerri-Lynn Scofield, Skilling Released from Prison After a Decade of Doing Time, Naked Capitalism. Former Enron CEO Jell Skilling paid for his crimes. But the CEOs who brought us the Great Recession remain at large. A financial industry veteran explains why.
David Leonhardt, How the Upper Middle Class Is Really Doing, New York Times. A counter to the distracting narrative that positions the top 10 percent and not the top 1 percent as the new American aristocracy.
Greg Sargent, An election all about our Gilded Age levels of inequality, Washington Post. An interview with economist Gabriel Zucman.
Christopher Petrella, Anand Giridharadas: What wealthy people do is rig the discourse, Guardian. In an age of extraordinary plutocratic philanthropy, we risk forgetting that this same class of people is also undermining the greater good on an ongoing basis
Nomi Prins, Survival of the Richest, TomDispatch. America has become great again — at minting millionaires.
Spotlight: Diesel displacement in Myanmar Mee Panyar is helping villages in rural Myanmar transition from diesel to solar power through training programs to support electricians operating mini-grids. This decreases household electricity prices by up to 50%, reduces carbon emissions by 60%, and creates opportunity for productive uses. More»
- By Daniel Costa
Before the State of the Union, a fact check on black unemployment
By Valerie Wilson
|Build a Border Wall? Here’s What Border Communities Say They Want Instead
Gary Paul Nabhan
|FROM THE NEW ISSUEHow Soil Acts as a Living Witness to Racial Violence