From Cultural Survival – May/June 2020
Proven stewards of global biological and cultural heritage, the Indigenous Peoples have sustained respectful and reciprocal relationships with the natural world without undermining its life-sustaining functions for millennia. Despite the unrelenting assault of the “developed” world on the living planet, more than a quarter of the global land area continues to be traditionally owned, managed, or used by Indigenous Peoples, with some of the world’s most biologically and culturally diverse areas found within their ancestral territories, like those of Sápara people in Ecuador, or Karen people in Thailand .
With the Quechua, the sacred auki realm of the spirits, like apus, exist in balance that’s maintained through the practice of ayni, or sacred reciprocity.” This is at the heart of our biocultural heritage. “Biocultural heritage,” Argumedo describes, “is rooted in local practices of sharing economy and equitable governance of resources, based on local ethics, values and livelihoods, which are largely overlooked in the dominant top-down development.
The essence of the Blackfoot way of knowing, doing and being is based on interrelatedness and interdependence of Iinniiwa (buffalo in Blackfoot) and Sokitapiwa (people of the Plains).
Indigenous Environmental Network – Indigenous Principles of Just Transition
A Just Transition affirms the need for restoring indigenous life ways of responsibility and respect to the sacred Creation Principles and Natural Laws of Mother Earth and Father Sky, to live in peace with each other and to ensure harmony with nature, the Circle of Life, and within all Creation.
A Just Transition acknowledges the Earth is a living female organism – our Mother. Water is her lifeblood. The Earth and Father Sky, with its air and atmosphere, are the source of life to be protected, not merely a resource to be exploited, degraded, privatized and commodified.
A Just Transition includes the preservation and revitalization of our Indigenous languages that comprise accumulated ecological knowledge, spiritual wisdom, and indigenous traditional knowledge of building and maintaining sustainable communities. Language is our pathway to a sustainable living future.
A Just Transition recognizes our Indigenous rights, sovereignty, and assertion of self- determination to control and manage our ancestral lands, waters, and territories and all natural resources inclusive of our own laws, values, customs and traditions. Our lands and territories are at the core of our existence – we are the land and the land is us; we have a distinct spiritual and material relationship with our lands, waters and atmosphere-sky and territories and they are linked to our survival.
A Just Transition recognizes that Indigenous Nation authority does not just extend to the boundaries of the reservation/reserve. It extends over the respective traditional territories. This includes Treaty lands and un-ceded lands and waters taken without consent. This authority extends not only to hunting, fishing, food, plant and medicine gathering, but also to our sacred sites and protection of our watersheds and airsheds, as well as below ground.
A Just Transition acknowledges that Indigenous sovereignty is not defined by non-Indigenous laws, rules and regulations; or by dominant society forms of governance, economic development, and corporate structures. The relationship between Indigenous Nations and the United States and Canada is nation-to-nation and not merely government-to-government.
A Just Transition requires the need for US and Canadian governments to create policies that harmonize the duty to consult with Indigenous Nations and their peoples with the terms of Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC). FPIC is a basic underpinning to protect indigenous rights and interest that provides Indigenous Peoples with adequate and accessible information and whereby consensus and consent is determined in accordance with Indigenous Peoples’ customary laws and practices and free from any external manipulation or coercion. This includes participation in setting the terms and conditions addressing the economic, societal, cultural, spiritual and environmental and climate impacts.
A Just Transition acknowledges Indigenous traditions that tell us that all economic activity must be rooted in an understanding and respect of our sacred relationships with Mother Earth and Father Sky. We have our place and our responsibilities within Creation’s sacred order. The interdependence of humans and nature is primary. We recognize that there is no separation between how we treat nature and how we treat ourselves; the demand for the recognition of Indigenous rights and the Rights of Mother Earth are the one and same.
A Just Transition acknowledges the voices of Indigenous Peoples when they speak out for humanity to respect and take responsibility to protect the sacredness of water, air, land and the Circle of Life. Just transition recognizes the Rights of Nature or Rights of Mother Earth that seek to define equal legal rights for ecosystems to exist, flourish, and regenerate their natural capacities. Recognizing these rights places obligations on humans to live within, not above, the natural world, of which we are only one part, and to protect and replenish the ecosystems upon which our mutual well-being depends. It is necessary to transform our human relationship with nature from property-based to a legal rights-bearing entity.
A Just Transition requires a system change for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples to become true caretakers of the places in which they live, including writing new laws that recognize the rights of local ecosystems to maintain their vital cycles and eliminate harmful projects. These systems of Earth-Law or Earth Jurisprudence focuses on our responsibilities to foster natural ways and preempt corporate rights, property ownership, and financial speculation.
A Just Transition calls for the rejection of all market-based mechanisms that allow the quantification and commodification of Earth’s natural resources and processes, rebranded as ‘ecosystem services’, carbon trading, carbon offsets and financialization of Nature. These mechanisms have given way to the “financialization of Nature” process, which separates and quantifies the Earth’s cycles and functions – such as carbon, water and biodiversity – for turning them into “units” to be sold in financial and speculative markets. Indigenous Peoples here on Turtle Island and Indigenous Peoples all over the Earth see the commodification and quantification of natural resources and processes as flawed and as false solutions.
A Just Transition establishes the necessary elements of an economic system consistent with the Rights of Mother Earth to include:
- Immediately reducing production and consumption levels to within the natural order of Mother Earth;
- The full restoration of ecosystems, primarily allowing nature to heal itself;
- Elimination of economic systems and strategies that prioritize economic growth, and profit, and private acquisition of resources and wealth, above all other values;
- The elimination of substances that are toxic, persistent, and bioaccumulative;
- Zero waste systems for production, use, and decomposition known as cradle-to-cradle living;
- Recognition of sacred relationships with place, and;
- in all economic decisions and human activities, the wellbeing of Mother Earth and the Circle of All Life is primary.
A Just Transition adopts production mechanisms that use Toxic Use Reduction (TUR), Best Management Practices (BMPs), Precautionary Principles, No Harm Principles, as well as Zero Waste while moving forward a Just Transition model driven from the bottom up.
A Just Transition acknowledges the feasibility of transitioning to an economy in the U.S. and Canada based completely on renewable energy, with no carbon dioxide emissions and no nuclear energy.
A Just Transition means to leave more than 80% of known fossil fuel reserves under the soil and beneath the ocean floor and ban all new exploration and exploitation of oil, tar sands, oil/gas shale, coal, uranium, and natural gas, including transportation infrastructures.
A Just Transition is a vision-led, unifying and place-based set of principles, processes and practices that build cultural, social, economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy. The transition itself must be just and equitable; redressing past harms and creating new relationships of power for the future through reparations.
A Just Transition recognizes that strategies were first forged by labor unions and environmental justice groups, rooted in people of color and low-income communities as well as Indigenous lands; who jointly saw the need to phase out industries that were polluting workers, community and Mother Earth; and at the same time provide just pathways for workers to transition to other jobs. It was rooted in workers defining a transition away from toxic polluting industries in alliances with fence line and frontline communities.
A Just Transition encourages our Indigenous leadership to assume their role in supporting a just transition to a green economy, energy democracy, sustainable housing, education, community health care, clean energy and energy efficiency, sustainable community planning and natural resource management systems based upon indigenous science and traditional knowledge.
A Just Transition recognizes the role US and Canadian governments have played, as policy, for some Indigenous Nations to be invested in benefit-sharing of, and becoming economically dependent in fossil fuel, uranium and other extractive industrial developments. In these cases, it is a necessity for these colonial governments to provide financial support for an economic just transition for these Indigenous Nations, retraining of their Indigenous workers and ecological restoration to communities impacted by these dirty energy developments.
A Just Transition demands that every job pays a livable wage and stable income that protects workers, and provides a good standard of living and pathways out of poverty.
A Just Transition is food sovereignty. The seed is the first link in the food chain of our indigenous heritage crops. The protection of our native seeds is seed sovereignty. Food sovereignty promotes health through food, especially traditional foods that Indigenous Peoples relied on prior to colonization. Food sovereignty is about decolonizing Indigenous diets as we strive to maintain our right to healthy and culturally appropriate foods hunted, fished, gathered and grown through ecologically sound and sustainable methods and to resist the global, industrialized food system that corrupts our health and freedom through inappropriate food production and genetic engineering.
A Just Transition is our right to define our own food and indigenous agricultural systems. Food is a gift from the Creator. The right to food is sacred and cannot be constrained or recalled by colonial laws, policies and institutions. Food sovereignty includes a restorative framework for indigenous-based policy reform in hunting, fishing and gathering rights and forestry, fisheries, rangeland, environmental conservation, health, agriculture, and rural and community development.
A Just Transition acknowledges that Indigenous Peoples can make changes in our lives and take positive actions as individuals, families, clans and traditional societies and within Indigenous Nation tribal programs. In order for reality to shift, in order for solutions to major problems to be found and realized, we must transition away from the patterns of an industrialized mindset and confront one of the symptoms of colonization called Internalized Oppression. Just transition recognizes a decolonization process that incorporates physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual strategies since the body, the mind, heart and the soul are affected directly by colonialism. Just transition requires the healing from historical trauma.
A Just Transition recognizes the need for Indigenous ingenuity – Indigenuity – inspired by our ancient intergenerational knowledge and wisdom given to us by our natural relatives. Western science can work with indigenous traditional knowledge keepers to restore the health and well- being of our Mother Earth and Father Sky. Our traditional knowledge systems must be respected, promoted and protected; our collective intellectual property rights must be guaranteed and ensured. Our traditional knowledge is not in the public domain; it is collective, cultural and intellectual property protected under our customary law.
A Just Transition acknowledges that as Indigenous Peoples it is our responsibility to the rights of our future generations to uphold a future life of harmony, peace, equity and justice.
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
REIMAGINING THE POST-PANDEMIC “NORMAL”: LEARNING FROM INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ABOUT RECONCILING CULTURE AND NATURE
Share Cultural Survival, May 16, 2020
By Dr. Gleb Raygorodetsky
The devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic around the world have brought into sharp focus the role of unsustainable global financial and economic systems in the emergence and proliferation of zoonotic diseases. The unbridled plunder of Nature in the name of economic growth at any cost—from deforestation, to habitat degradation and fragmentation, to climate change, to species extinction—push more and more people into direct contact and conflict with the animals that carry dangerous pathogens. However devastating, the global COVID-19 pandemic is just the tip of the iceberg of converging global crises—biodiversity loss, droughts, mega-fires, floods, rising temperatures, pollution, ocean acidification—in a world where we value economy over ecology, where greed supplants care, where “rights” blind us to responsibilities, where we worship a golden idol over Mother Earth.
In the depths of the pandemic, we feel like misbehaving children given the longest time-out ever to contemplate our bad behavior and try to grasp the meaning of the Nature’s message. We are torn between the desire to get back to “normal,” and a growing awareness of abnormalities inherent in the status quo that make us question our health care and food security, global trade and elderly care, social norms and education. More and more experts are calling on the global community to “build back better” after the pandemic by creating more sustainable and resilient societies and reimagining our place in this world. What might this look like?
“It’s clear that the mode we’ve been practicing over the past 150 years has driven us into a ditch, and the last thing we want coming out of this COVID crisis is to get everything back going the way it was before the meltdown,” says Dr. David Suzuki, an award-winning Canadian geneticist, broadcaster, and author, speaking from his cabin on British Columbia’s Discovery Islands, which COVID-19 had turned from a weekend getaway into a refuge during months of self-quarantine. “The only people with the track record of having lived in balance with Nature are the Indigenous Peoples. We’ve got to recognize that now. Their way of seeing the world is radically different from the western capitalist growth-driven system. It’s rooted in a value system where we are utterly dependent on Nature. As we emerge from this pandemic, we must be guided by the examples and teachings of Indigenous Peoples practicing reciprocal obligations of responsibility to do everything possible to ensure that Nature can continue to thrive.”
“We’re running out of time and options, unless we immediately and fundamentally transform our relationship with Nature,” says Dr. Liette Vasseur, President of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO, reflecting on post-COVID recovery in light of the conclusions of The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, released by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) in 2019. The most comprehensive assessment of its kind, bringing together the best available knowledge from both Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing, the IPBES Assessment concluded that immediate transformative changes of economic, financial, and governance systems are essential to restore and protect Nature, including over one million species threatened with extinction. Though the report paints our planet’s future in dark tones, there are some hopeful signs that come from Indigenous Peoples and local communities who, for millennia, have relied on their holistic ways of knowing, doing, and being to safeguard Nature.
“The prevailing opinion that culture and Nature are somehow separate must become obsolete,” says Vasseur. “Such a deceptive view of culture-Nature disconnect is at the root of our utilitarian view of the world based on the infinite economic growth. But our planet, our Mother Earth, is finite. We have no other place to go. Because they have been living closely with Nature for generations, the Indigenous Peoples know how to live sustainably within planetary boundaries. We are realizing more and more that Indigenous knowledge and science must come together – we simply have no other choice.”
Proven stewards of global biological and cultural heritage, the Indigenous Peoples have sustained respectful and reciprocal relationships with the natural world without undermining its life-sustaining functions for millennia. Despite the unrelenting assault of the “developed” world on the living planet, more than a quarter of the global land area continues to be traditionally owned, managed, or used by Indigenous Peoples, with some of the world’s most biologically and culturally diverse areas found within their ancestral territories, like those of Sápara people in Ecuador, or Karen people in Thailand.
“Working on reconciling culture and Nature is our priority,” continues Dr. Vasseur, “A big part of it is advancing reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples, youth, and women in all aspects of Canadian Commission for UNESCO’s work, including reconciliation with Indigenous ways of knowing that see culture and Nature as inseparable.”
Indigenous ways of knowing, doing, and being are increasingly recognized as integral in our responses to global pandemics, climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem degradation. As we attempt to reimagine our place in Nature in the face of escalating and converging crises, it behooves us to learn from our Indigenous brothers and sisters how to heal the culture-Nature divide. We may learn from the Quechua people protecting traditional varieties of potato in Peru, for example, how to reconcile our relationships with the plants of our world. We might learn how to reconcile our relationship with animals by looking to the Kainai First Nation in Canada who are repatriating buffalo back to their traditional territory. We could learn from the Aboriginal Traditional Owners in Australia reviving their ancestral relationship with fire, how to reconcile our relationship with Nature’s elements. And we can learn how to restore our intimacy with all our relations from the Moriori people of New Zealand maintaining their ancestral traditions of peaceful coexistence with all living beings. Only by recognizing the timeless values of these lived experiences and applying these lessons to our own ways of knowing, doing, and being, can we ever hope to reimagine “normal” in post-COVID world, and “build back better.”
Wisps of steam rise from the starchy flesh of freshly baked potatoes, the charred parchment of their skins split open. The vapor mixes with the ringlets of smoke lingering over the blackened clumps of the huatia, the traditional oven conjured from earth, then broken up when the cooking is done.
A stocky Quechua farmer stands over the steaming heap of baked tubers and upturned smoldering earth. Embellishing his woolen poncho and beaded ear-flapped hat, or chullo, are rainbow-colored depictions of the surrounding altiplano landscape and its inhabitants.
The farmer raises both hands in greeting to the snow-covered peaks, offering the traditional k’intu—three leaves from the sacred coca plant firmly gripped in his fingers. He gives thanks to the Apus – the mountain spirits that look after his homeland, the Urubamba Valley. He then expresses gratitude to Mother Earthfor looking after all his relations, from rocks to trees, from llamas to springs, from glaciers to the potato.
Situated in the heart of Peruvian Andes, twelve miles north of Cusco, the Urubamba Valley, known as the Sacred Valley of the Incas, is a long-recognized hotspot of biological diversity. For over three thousand years, the local Quechua people have looked after the region’s agrobiodiversity—the intricate web of relationships between local people, domesticated species of plants, their wild ancestors, and the ecosystems all depend on. The Quechua stewardship of these montane landscapes is grounded in sophisticated Indigenous systems of knowledge and innovation, rooted in the profound understanding of, and reverence for, Pachamama, or Mother Earth.
The area is home to a wide range of Andean food crops, such as quinoa, lima beans, peppers, yucca or manioc, squash, and maize. Significantly, this birthplace of the potato continues to nurture eight known wild species and 1,340 locally recognized, named, and cultivated varieties of the plant.
In 2005, six local Quechua communities partnered with the Peruvian non-governmental organization Asociación ANDES to set aside 9,280 hectares of the Urubamba Valley as the Potato Park in order to protect this vital source of sustenance and wellbeing for future generations. To strengthen their traditional collective rights to the biological and cultural wealth of their territory, the local Quechua communities have collaborated with the Asociación ANDES in governing the Potato Park as a globally recognized Indigenous Biocultural Heritage Area (IBCHA) that advances a unique holistic model of bridging conservation and sustainable use of agrobiodiversity in pursuit of Sumak kawsay.
“Sumak kawsay is a Quechua holistic term for good living,” explains Alejandro Argumedo, Program Director of the Asociación ANDES. “We achieve good living when the runas realm of people and their domesticated crops and animals, the sallka realm of wild plants and animals, and the sacred auki realm of the spirits, like apus, exist in balance that’s maintained through the practice of ayni, or sacred reciprocity.” This is at the heart of our biocultural heritage. “Biocultural heritage,” Argumedo describes, “is rooted in local practices of sharing economy and equitable governance of resources, based on local ethics, values and livelihoods, which are largely overlooked in the dominant top-down development. In the Potato Park, people respect the authority of the sacred Apus in maintaining wellbeing of their entire community – plants, animals, water, and rocks. The Apus ensure that water is plentiful, pastures are healthy, and seeds are potent. They are integrated into human daily activities and are communicated with, through rituals and offerings. People recognize that they have water because of the work of the Apus. If pastures dry up, it’s because the Apus are not doing their job and the local shamans need to step in to remedy the situation.”
“We must reclaim Indigenous biocultural landscapes that have been sacrificed to global capital and industrial agriculture,” Argumedo continues. “We need to restore them to localized economies and food systems, as we reimagine how we see ourselves in the Natural world. It is critical because these highly diverse agricultural systems include immune-boosting crops and medicinal plants that heal the body and the spirit, and are a source of ethical behavior that is very much needed at this time.”
For millennia, the vast expanse of Turtle Island, as North America is known to many of the continent’s Indigenous Peoples, was a bioculturally rich landscape shaped by the mutualistic relationships between Indigenous Peoples and plains bison, or buffalo. From the end of the Pleistocene to the time before European colonization, the multi-million-strong buffalo herds grazed the prairies, tilled the soils, and wallowed in the dirt across the Great Bison Belt – the immense tract of grasslands stretching from the Gulf of Mexico to the Rocky Mountains.
As a cultural keystone species, the plains bison was the nexus of the intricate and resilient web of relationships between the continent’s soils, plants, insects, birds, mammals, and Indigenous Peoples. With the arrival of European settlers in the 19th century, this biocultural system began to degrade, with bison herds virtually eradicated and Indigenous Peoples that depended on them greatly diminished and displaced to make room for railroads, settlers, and cattle.
Today, the enduring vestiges of the former bison range found on both sides of US-Canadian border are small and disconnected. Without the bison as the keystone species, the prairie ecosystems have lost their resilience. Without the bison as the cultural keystone species, the Indigenous Peoples’ well being has also eroded.
“The disappearance of iconic symbols in a society means the beginning of the disappearance of a culture,” explains Dr. Leroy Little Bear, a respected Kainai elder, Blackfoot scholar, a professor emeritus at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, and an Officer of the Order of Canada. “Imagine what would happen to Christians if all Christian crosses and churches were gone. The disappearance of the buffalo had a similar devastating effect on our people. Our youth now hear our buffalo songs, stories, and watch our ceremonies, but they do not see the buffalo roaming around.”
The essence of the Blackfoot way of knowing, doing and being is based on interrelatedness and interdependence of Iinniiwa (buffalo in Blackfoot) and Sokitapiwa (people of the Plains). A number of Indigenous nations and their allies have been working on bringing buffalo back to their traditional territories, to restore the human-bison biocultural landscape and revive culture-Nature connection.
In 2009, a small group of Kainai elders, led by Dr. Little Bear, embarked on a series of US-Canada transboundary “buffalo dialogues.” Supported by the Wildlife Conservancy Society (WCS), the dialogues involved Kainai, Siksiika, Piikani and Amskapi Pikuni First Nations, and lead to the creation of Iinnii Initiative aimed at strengthening cultural, spiritual, and ecological connections with the land and wildlife through the repatriation of the Iiniiwa. In September 2014, several participants of the Iinnii Initiative signed the transboundary Buffalo Treaty “to welcome buffalo to once again live among us… to nurture each other culturally and spiritually.” Today, close to thirty Indigenous nations on both sides of the US-Canada border have signed on to the Treaty.
“In our stories, Nappi-the-trickster hid buffalo from our people because they were not treating buffalo very well,” says Little Bear. “Our prophecies tell us that those buffalo will return from the mountains. This is where we are working now under the Buffalo Treaty to bring buffalo back.”
“We are bringing buffalo back not for subsistence,” continues Little Bear, “But for the spiritual and cultural rebirth of our peoples. Once the buffalo return, they take care of us by helping us spiritually, as well as bringing ecological balance to the land. Buffalo is the best environmentalist you can have. Wherever buffalo is, the birds and the plants you haven’t seen for a long time end up coming back.”
Prominent conservation organizations like the WCS, the Nature Conservancy, and the WWF are documenting ecosystem and biodiversity benefits from bison reintroductions. Bison grazing and wallowing creates a rich mosaic of diverse habitats beneficial to ground-nesting birds like burrowing owls; insects like dung beetles; rodents like deer mice and black-tailed prairie dogs; and carnivores like swift fox and endangered black-footed ferret. The benefits to Indigenous Peoples are just as transformative.
“Bringing buffalo back makes our culture stronger, revitalizing it,” Little Bear continues. “The buffalo is important for our language. Not only did we have ways of describing all the parts of the buffalo used for subsistence, but also ways of talking about their feeding habits, where they roam, their seasonal movements, their spiritual aspects, and economic worth. Our songs, stories, and ceremonies are interwoven with the spirit of the buffalo. The Blackfoot Buffalo Women Society and the Horns Society are examples of the spiritual importance of the buffalo to the Blackfoot, and they are continuing to this day.”
“It’s a dream of our elders, to once again see the buffalo roam on the prairies,” says Little Bear. ”Our elders told us that though there might be only few living bison left, the spirit of the Buffalo never left.”
“Old people, listen to me! We are here!” Dean Yibarbuk calls out as he ambles in his worn flip-flops through the knee-high grass amid the sparse trees of the wooded savannah of Australia’s Top End. “We have come to look after the country,” he tells his ancestors who take care of the vast expanses of their traditional territory.
A Gurrgoni man, a Traditional Owner of the country that is now within the Warddeken Indigenous Protected Area in Australia’s Northern Territory, Yibarbuk tosses a lit match on the ground and watches the flames begin to nibble at a patch of grass. Drawing from the deep well of his people’s ancestral knowledge of fire, he continues on his meandering path, methodically choosing the apt spots to light the grassy understory. He is fulfilling his ancestral responsibility – looking after the country for his people and for future generations.
The tropical savannahs of Northern Australia’s Arnhem Land are one of the most fire-prone landscapes on earth. Over millennia, the Aboriginal peoples developed cultural burning practices that sustained the health of the land and its peoples. As they walked the country, they lit small, low-intensity cool fires before the vegetation got too dense and dry later in the season. Small mammals and ground-nesting birds would easily escape the fires and eventually return to the burned area. Traditional fire management created and sustained a patchy mosaic of diverse habitats nourishing the rich biocultural diversity, which embraced wallabies and worldviews, soils and songs, lizards and languages. Aboriginal cultural burning sustained the wellbeing of Australia’s Aboriginal peoples while maintaining, and even enhancing, biological diversity and the ecosystem services they depended on.
The infectious diseases spread in the wake of European colonization of the continent, along with the government policies of assimilation, relocation, and settlement, decimated Aboriginal populations across Australia. As a result, by the beginning of the 21st century, Aboriginal traditions of cultural burning had largely disappeared from the continent, leaving the vast swaths of tropical savannahs increasingly vulnerable to the out of control, late-season infernos. The scorching blazes that for months in 2019 and 2020 swept across thousands of square kilometers of savannahs in Australia, devoured everything in their path—soils, vegetation, birds and animals unable to escape. They also produced more than 3% of Australia’s annual Green House Gas (GHGs) emissions.
Yibarbuk and his people have led the way in reviving cultural burning as part of their ancestral responsibilities for looking after their country. The innovative West Arnhem Land Fire Abatement (WALFA) project was launched in early 2000s by the North Australia’s Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance (NAILSMA). Over the two decades of collaboration between Traditional Land Owners and researchers, supported through carbon markets, the WALFA project has clearly showed the value of restoring Aboriginal peoples’ traditions of caring for the country. Revitalizing cultural burning has revived the region’s biodiversity, restored ecosystem services, enhanced Aboriginal peoples’ wellbeing, and mitigated climate change by reducing green house gas (GHG) emissions.
Since traditional owners resumed their cultural practices of caring for the country with fire around 2006, the GHGs emissions in the region have dropped significantly and biodiversity is beginning to return. The program has been able to create and maintain over 200 local jobs for Aboriginal rangers each year. The lessons and success of this program have led to the inclusion of Indigenous fire management into Australia’s Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI), a carbon offsets scheme, which, among other things, allows traditional land owners to earn carbon credits through the reduction in GHG emissions using cultural burning. The unprecedented 2019-2020 fire season in Australia makes revival of cultural burning traditions more imperative than ever.
“The old people have passed,” says Yibarbuk, “but we need to find new ways to look after our country.”
The tree is beaming – bruised into its bark is an ancient dendroglyph of a human figure with a heart-shaped face grinning from ear to ear.
“Our ancestors, karapuna, were very intelligent people, living simple but happy lives,” says Maui Solomon, the Chairman of Hokotehi Moriori Trust and a barrister, describing Rākau Momori – the images of Moriori ancestors etched into the “memorial” kōpi trees. “They mastered the art of a balanced existence with the environment and all their relatives–beings of the land and sea. Their story holds many lessons for us,” Solomon says.
The Indigenous Moriori live on Rēkohu, or the Chatham Islands in English, almost 800 km southeast from the mainland Aotearoa, or New Zealand. Their origin stories tell of first voyaging canoes, or wakas, arriving from Central Polynesia and from Aotearoa around the same time as Aotearoa was settled by Māori some thousand years ago.
During the original settlement of Rēkohu, Moriori brought with them the evergreen kōpi tree, as a source of food and shelter. Kōpi berries and nuts, when prepared properly,were an important source of nourishment. Groves of kōpi trees provided the much-needed shelter on the wind-swept Rēkohu, or “Misty Sun” in English.
“Magnificent cathedrals,” this is how Solomon describes groves of kōpi trees – their immense canopies suspended over understory-free forest floor, dimly lit by occasional shafts of light piercing the interlaced crowns. Often located near ancient living places, burial sites, and middens, the few remaining kōpi groves, Solomon explains, serve as a reminder of how karapuna used to live before their “discovery” in 1791 by the Chatham, a British ship that had been blown off course to Rēkohu.
The whaling and sealing crews that followed the Chatham to Rēkohu encountered a peaceful people whose sophisticated knowledge and traditions—rooted in reverence for Nature in all of its interdependent ecological, cultural and spiritual manifestations—sustained their wellbeing without overexploiting the island’s biodiversity. A fundamental tradition guiding Moriori lives for centuries has been the covenant of peace, known as Nunuku’s law.
“It’s a peaceful existence in the most holistic sense,” Solomon explains. “Not only peace between humans, mind you, but peace with the land, peace with the sea, peace with the air, peace with all our relations.” For six centuries, Moriori have obeyed this covenant.
According to Moriori lore, a respected Moriori spiritual leader named Nunuku-whenua, fed up with the violence between Moriori, called upon the warring tribes to uphold their ancestral teachings of peace that forbade killings and cannibalism.
“From now and forever, never again let there be war,” Nunuku proclaimed. Heeding his request, the Moriori stopped their hostilities, gave up their own power to end life through making war, and placed it into the hands of their gods. Since then, the people would resolve any dispute—be it over resources, relationships, or boundaries—only through ritualized combat with wooden staffs twice the thickness of a thumb. Upon first blood drawn, fighting would cease, and honour would be satisfied.
The greatest test of Nunuku’s law came in 1835, when 900 members of the Ngati Tama and Ngati Mutunga Māori tribes, originally from Taranaki, decided to invade Rēkohu, attracted by its abundant resources and in the knowledge that the islands’ peace-loving inhabitants would not be able to defend them. Soon after their arrival, the Māori began killing and enslaving the peaceful Moriori. While young Moriori men wanted to fight back against the invaders, the elders insisted that Moriori must uphold their sacred covenant of peace with the gods and protect their mana, or honour. They maintained that their customary law of peace was a moral imperative and that they would never return to war and killing. Instead, they must offer peace and friendship to the newcomers, insisted the elders, and share with them the Island’s many gifts.
Moriori upheld the Nunuku’s law and, as the colonial government stood by, over 1900 of them were either killed by Maori, perished in enslavement, died of introduced diseases, or succumbed to despair. By 1862, only 101 Moriori survived. In 1933, when the last known full-blooded Moriori died, the Moriori people were officially declared extinct. He was Tame Horomona Rehe, also known as Tommy Solomon, Maui Solomon’s grandfather.
His descendants and other Moriori have fought political and legal battles since the mid-1980s to be recognized as the original Rēkohu people, who have maintained continuous cultural identity for centuries. In 2020, Moriori signed an historic deed of settlement with the Crown for $18M in reparations; the Crown also agreed to return Crown-owned lands to Moriori, protect their sacred places, restore traditional Moriori place names, and allow the people to reclaim their rightful role in the management of the islands’ natural resources. Restoring kōpi groves, and associated Rākau Momori dendroglyphs, has been one of their priorities.
“It’s not just a picture on a tree for us,” says Solomon, “It’s an ancestor and a connection to the past that sustain us spiritually.” Moriori have an obligation and a commitment to “put the cloak back on the land” as Solomon describes it. “Kōpi groves shelter the land, protect it from erosion, attract moisture, bring the birds back. All of this is linked to our cultural renaissance and all of these things are growing together.”
Solomon has a lot of respect for his ancestors’ decision not to return to killing and fighting. “It was no longer the way for them to exist as human beings,” he reflects. ”Even though I battle against it in my mind from time to time, I still respect them for it. They’ve been there and would not be going back. It has worked for them on this island, their home that they have successfully looked after for hundreds of years and thrived.”
At the inaugural 2011 Me Rongo Congress for Peace, Sustainability and Respect for the Sacred held at the Kōpinga Marae on Rēkohu, Moriori’s unbroken commitment to Nunuku’s law was reaffirmed through the Me Rongo declaration. Moriori renewed their commitment to live together on Rēkohu in peace and respect, to share the resources of the land and the sea, and to inspire the next generation to learn about, and uphold the values and wisdom of, their ancestors.
“Culture and Nature have been artificially separated for too long,” reflects John Scott, a descendant of the Iningai people of Central Queensland in Australia and a Senior Program Manager of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). “Only by recognizing their intrinsic value and interdependence can we hope to pave the way forward, toward living in harmony with Nature.”
In his opening remarks to the North American Dialogue on Biocultural Diversity in Montreal in 2019, Scott stressed that the Convention’s work toward achieving its vision of a humanity “Living in Harmony with Nature,” which must be guided by the Indigenous Peoples and firmly based on reconciling culture and Nature within CBD’s post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.
The Dialogue, co-organized by the CBD Secretariat, UNESCO, and the Center for Indigenous Conservation and Development Alternatives (CICADA) on the traditional territory of Kanien’keha:ka Nation in Montreal, brought together over 100 Indigenous experts and their partners and allies from across North America, united by their passion and concern for Nature and culture. A significant outcome of the workshop was the Atateken Declaration (Atateken means ‘brothers and sisters’ in the Kanien’kéha (Mohawk) language, and implies fraternity and peace). Also called the North American Regional Declaration on Biocultural Diversity, it calls upon governments and international conservation organizations to:
- diligently work toward removing any conceptual and practical separation of biological and cultural diversity from conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making;
- create and sustaine conditions for mobilizing Indigenous knowledge by the knowledge holders to guide conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making; and,
- strengthen actions and strategies that link biological and cultural diversity through the holistic lens of relationships between humans and Nature.
The North American Regional Declaration on Biocultural Diversity
The Atateken Declaration1
Declaration and Recommended Actions
More than one hundred participants, Indigenous Peoples of North America, together with partners and supporters, united by their passion and concern for nature and culture, came together at the first North American Dialogue on Biocultural Diversity to advance an alliance to promote the diversity of life on earth, in all its beauty and diversity.
Biocultural Diversity – the diversity of life in all its interdependent manifestations: biological, cultural, linguistic, and spiritual – is a fundamental component of environmental conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making at local, regional, and global scales.
We, the participants of the first North American Dialogue on Biocultural Diversity,
With deep gratitude to the Kanien’keha:ka Nation, who welcomed us to this gathering place, which is the traditional territory of Indigenous peoples who have cared for this land since time immemorial;
Recognizing and building on the lessons learned from the Joint Programme of Work between the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on the Links between Biological and Cultural Diversity (2010-2020), and the programmes of work on traditional knowledge, including the Plan of Action on Customary Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity2 and the programme of work on protected areas under the Convention on Biological Diversity;
Acknowledging that biological and cultural diversity are interconnected, mutually reinforcing, interdependent, and often co-evolved;
Recognizing that indigenous peoples embody biocultural diversity, with different genders fulfilling crucial roles in conserving nature and culture;
1 “Atateken” in Kanien’kéha, the Mohawk language, meaning ‘brothers and sisters’ and as such implies fraternity and peace.
2 Decision XIII/12 B, annex.
Recognizing the critical role of indigenous youth in safeguarding the future of biocultural diversity;
Acknowledging that indigenous languages epitomize the inextricable links between cultural and biological diversity, and the importance of supporting this connection during the United Nations International Year of Indigenous Languages3 in 2019 and beyond;
Recognizing the historical injustices and destruction that indigenous peoples have suffered regarding their ancestral lands, waters, traditional management practices and related cultural heritage;
Acknowledging the ten (10) principles established through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Canada);4
Emphasizing the significance of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) as the minimum international standard to respect and recognize the rights of indigenous peoples;
Recognizing that the diverse worldviews or cosmologies encapsulated in the rituals and spiritual practices specific to each indigenous Nation across North America are a fundamental part of the life of indigenous peoples;
Recognizing that indigenous peoples’ territories, traditional lands and waters, and sacred sites and areas embody the holistic connection to Mother Earth including the four elements – water, air, earth and fire- and are important for:
a) Sustaining indigenous peoples’ cultures, spiritualities, languages, identities, and ancestral heritage and memory in order to promote and transmit the teachings to the current and future generations;
b) Protecting biological diversity (plants, animals, their habitats, ecosystems and genetic diversity).
Emphasizing that international commitments related to biodiversity, climate change, sustainable development and world heritage can only be achieved with the full and effective participation of indigenous peoples and recognition of their rights and responsibilities to ancestral lands and waters, customary sustainable use and their related knowledge, innovation and practices;
Recognizing indigenous peoples’ rights to self-determination, to self-governance and to provide or withhold free, prior and informed consent to any proposed activities, including in the name of development and conservation, that may affect ancestral lands and waters;
Recognizing the critical role that indigenous peoples play in global biodiversity conservation, including in national and international systems of protected and conserved areas, through the establishment and governance of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas, tribal parks, and other indigenous peoples’ conserved territories and areas (ICCAs).
3 Resolution 71/178.
4 Reconciliation, Self-Determination, Healing Relationships, Decolonization, Equity and Inclusivity, Mutual Respect, Ethical Space, Reconnection, Trust Building, Education and Outreach.
Threats and Challenges to Indigenous Peoples and Biocultural Diversity
Affirming that, in order to move forward, we have to acknowledge the historical context and ongoing legacy of colonialism;
Considering multiple injustice and continuing threats to indigenous peoples and their ancestral lands and waters including from climate and socio-ecological changes, extractive industries such as mining, forestry, hydroelectric development, oil and gas, and their associated infrastructure (such as roads and the use of helicopters), urbanization, technology, appropriation of lands, exclusion from protected areas, lack of full and effective participation in the governance and management of protected areas, unsustainable tourism, military operations (such as low level flying), dominant non-indigenous educational systems including residential schools, religious imposition, violation of intellectual property rights, indigenous identity stealing to access rights and lands, and vandalism;
Recognizing the need for adequate financial and human resources for indigenous peoples to exercise their specific rights and inherent responsibilities in co-management processes to achieve true environmental co-governance;
Emphasizing that separating biological and cultural diversity in conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making leads to diverging and conflicting agendas, leading to varying and sometimes competing interests;
The Dialogue considered the leading role of indigenous peoples in maintaining and enhancing biocultural diversity through the following themes: indigenous languages and traditional forms of knowledge; livelihoods, food sovereignty, health, and the nexus of nature, culture, and well-being; culturally-specific applications of communications technologies; inter-legalities and indigenous rights; and indigenous peoples’ stewardship of their territories of life.
Next Steps Forward
We, the participants, therefore recommend the following actions that would create an enabling environment for thriving communities of life:
Actions at Local Level
Support indigenous peoples in advancing indigenous-led strategies and actions to protect, revitalize, and sustain indigenous languages and knowledge systems by supporting intergenerational language and knowledge transfer through formal and non-formal education;
Support indigenous peoples in their stewardship and sustainable use of their traditional territories, lands and waters, including through Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas, tribal parks, and conserved territories and areas (ICCAs);
Support youth engagement in building a future based on their communities’ cultural values, including indigenous knowledge systems, values, and identities as well as through formal educational opportunities such as universities and graduate programs.
Actions at National Level and Provincial/State/Territorial Level
Call upon Governments to:
Recognize historical injustices and destruction that indigenous people have suffered regarding their culture, language, identity and spirituality, and construct processes of reconciliation and cultural restoration;
Accelerate the recognition of indigenous peoples’ ancestral lands and waters as a means to transformational change in the protection of biocultural diversity, for all life on Earth;
Honour and secure the rights identified in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,5 including those that foster biocultural diversity by upholding indigenous peoples’ ownership, use, and management of their territories, lands, and waters and respect for their knowledge, cultures, livelihoods, and self-governance;
Recognize the diversity of indigenous peoples and that each local context is unique and therefore requires different context-specific applications of indigenous peoples’ rights, which respect specific views, needs and priorities;
Respect distinct indigenous knowledge systems, spirituality, beliefs, practices and cultures; long-standing rules, principles and laws of governance and management systems of their territories, traditional lands and waters and sacred sites and areas and related knowledge;
Adapt governmental regulations and laws to better respect and reflect indigenous visions;
Respect and make space for indigenous leadership, including contemporary and customary indigenous governance systems;
Ensure the effective participation of indigenous peoples in all matters of relevance to them;
Recognize and protect sacred sites and features, including within protected and conserved areas, and respect indigenous peoples’ responsibility to care for them;
Recognize, respect, and support indigenous peoples’ customary land tenure and customary stewardship, sustainable use, and management of their traditional territories and ancestral lands and waters, including harvesting within protected and conserved areas and their governance and co-governance of protected and conserved areas, including as Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas, tribal parks, and conserved territories and areas (ICCAs);
Fully implement existing and develop new commitments regarding traditional knowledge and customary sustainable use;
Support the repatriation and restoration of languages, traditional knowledge and related information, and artefacts (intangible and tangible cultural heritage) to assist indigenous peoples in protecting, revitalizing, and strengthening their knowledge systems;
Respect confidentiality of and access to culturally-sensitive information and indigenous control over such information;
Develop holistic approaches to remove any conceptual and practical separation of biological and cultural diversities from siloed colonial approaches to conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making;
Remove the negative or perverse incentives that threaten biocultural diversity and harm nature;
Respect customary procedures, community protocols, or other guidance for respectful relationships, as developed by the relevant indigenous peoples, especially as it may pertain to traditional knowledge, as well as related resources;
Advance co-governance between indigenous peoples and external governments, agencies, NGOs and other key stakeholders, based on equity and positive reciprocity, drawing on indigenous knowledge systems, as fundamental to taking care of ancestral lands and waters;
Create and sustain conditions for mobilizing indigenous knowledge systems by the knowledge holders to guide conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making;
Support communities developing education based on their own cultural values as well as efforts that enable more culturally-appropriate education with direct benefits to the community. University curricula must also change to accommodate diverse, including indigenous, worldviews;
Recognize the importance of meaningful dialogues done in a good way within an ethical space, cognizant of the time and resources necessary to support long-term relationships built on trust, respect, transparency, and accountability.
Actions for International Entities including Conservation Organizations
Be a good ally to indigenous peoples, working collaboratively in a good way, based on compassion and positive reciprocity;
Ensure the effective participation of indigenous peoples as partners and rights holders in the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, at all levels, including in the development of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework;
Use the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as a minimal human rights framework when working with indigenous peoples;
Call on proponents of nature conservation to engage in a rights-based approach respectfully with indigenous peoples and ensure indigenous peoples’ worldviews, responsibilities, relations, values and priorities are appropriately reflected in conservation strategies and actions;
Support indigenous peoples’ stewardship and sustainable use of their traditional territories, lands, and waters, including through protected and conserved areas governed by them or co-governed by them as Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas and ICCAs with respect for their knowledge, values, and management practices;
Strengthen actions, strategies and biocultural indicators that link biological and cultural diversity through the lens of relationships between humans and nature;
Develop biocultural indicators of well-being rooted in place-based cultural perspectives, values and knowledge systems, through culturally-appropriate and ethical processes of co-development, co-validation, and knowledge co-creation;
Develop indicators, both context specific and generalizable, particularly those that relate to traditional livelihoods, land and marine stewardship, food and water sovereignty and security and the relationships among cultures, economies and ecosystems;
Support indigenous peoples in their efforts to restore, protect, and sustain their traditional foods, diets, and lifeways;
Explore the relationships between traditional diets, traditional medicines and human health and impacts of socio-environmental and climatic changes on food sovereignty and human health and well-being;
Recognize Indigenous peoples’ reciprocal relationship with their traditional lands and waters, including through governance, management and conservation of their collective territories through bio-cultural approaches, such as Indigenous Protected Areas, Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas, tribal parks, and conserved territories and areas (ICCAs);
Ensure that indigenous ways of knowing are integral to biocultural diversity monitoring, conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making, leading to equitable outcomes;
Increase resources available to indigenous peoples for engaging in biocultural diversity monitoring, conservation, sustainable development, and decision-making;
Develop and Support ethical processes that ensure respectful braiding of oral, written and spiritual strands of multiple knowledge systems in the service of Mother Earth;
Ensure culturally-appropriate conservation and restoration of cultural keystone species and spaces;
Include, promote, and advocate for indigenous-led research on wildlife, the environment and resources, which should be supported and implemented by government, industry and academia;
Apply the precautionary principle to prevent possible harm to indigenous cultures, lifestyles and people themselves as well as to prevent possible harm to biodiversity and the environment;
Ensure capacity development and on-going funding of indigenous peoples is provided so that they are empowered to exercise their rights and responsibilities over their ancestral lands and waters.
“Let’s face it, humanity has been the most destructive virus this planet has ever known,” says Maui Solomon reflecting on the COVID-19 pandemic and the lessons that his people, a tiny but resilient nation from a remote Pacific archipelago, might offer to humankind trying to reimagine its relationship with the planet. “But, would we acknowledge it? Of course not! Because we are so caught up in our right to take as much as we want from this planet until there is nothing left. We need to make peace with our planet. Unless we do, the human species won’t have a future.”
According to Solomon, Moriori’s ancient covenant of peace offers a vision of the world where humans live respecting each other and their environment. “The journey we are on, as a people,” he says, “Is to become a more sustainable island by looking at traditional Moriori ways as well as modern day science. All of this blends into how we, as a human species, learn to survive and be more sustainable in places we inhabit. Today, we are trying to understand and reclaim that, relearn what it means and how it applies in the modern-day context. Peace is a worldwide aspiration, even though we, as humankind, don’t seem to be able to achieve it. The lesson our karapuna, ancestors, share with us is simple: never ever give up hope! This is a powerful message to carry forward.”
Solomon talks about taking his six-year old moko (short for mokopuna, or grandson in Moriori) fishing at sea and planting trees around Rēkohu. “I want him to know that as the world is crumbling,” says Solomon, “we are doing everything we can to give this gift to him. You can still go to those reefs and get our traditional foods because we have looked after that resource. You can still grow beautiful trees on the land because we looked after the land. We have everything here that’s needed to sustain life. If you want to live well and happily, this is what we’ve left you. This is our gift to our children and grandchildren.”
In Cultural Survival, May 2020
–Dr. Gleb Raygorodetsky is a biocultural diversity expert, with over two decades of experience working for, collaborating with, and writing about the world’s Indigenous Peoples. In his award-winning book, The Archipelago of Hope: Wisdom and Resilience from the Edge of Climate Change, he documents how the inextricable relationship between Indigenous cultures and their territories forms the foundation for climate change resilience around the world. You can find him on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
About the Book
Blackfoot Ways of Knowing is a journey into the heart and soul of Blackfoot culture. As a scholar and researcher, Betty Bastien places Blackfoot tradition within a historical context of precarious survival amid colonial displacement and cultural genocide. In sharing her personal story of reclaimed identity, Bastien offers a gateway into traditional Blackfoot ways of understanding and experiencing the world.
For the Siksikaitsitapi, knowledge is experiential, participatory, and ultimately sacred. Bastien maps her own process of coming to know, stressing the recovery of the Blackfoot language and Blackfoot notions of reciprocal responsibilities and interdependence.
Rekindling traditional ways of knowing is essential for Indigenous peoples in Canada to heal and rebuild their communities and cultures. By sharing what she has learned, Betty Bastien hopes to ensure that the next generation of Indigenous people will enjoy a future of hope and peace.
Betty Bastien is an instructor in indigenous studies at the University of Calgary. Her experience includes teaching and curriculum design at Red Crow Community College, in the Native studies department at the University of Lethbridge, and at the University of Calgary.
Jurgen W. Kremer, who contributes an afterword to the book, is an executive editor of ReVision – Journal of Consciousness and Transformation. He has written about ethnoautobiography, dissociation, healing and cosmology, and violence against indigenous peoples.
Duane Mistaken Chief provides language consultation and is a senior instructor and lecturer in Blackfoot language and Blackfoot ways of life at Red Crow Community College on the Blood Reserve.
Praise for Blackfoot Ways of Knowing:
Betty Bastien’s ambitious goal is no less than the decolonization of Blackfoot ways of knowing as a vehicle to regaining independence, promoting personal and cultural healing, and providing a basis for a new educational system . . . Bastien has done a good job in capturing the complex issues that concern many Blackfoot elders who are striving to live by means of traditional teachings and fulfilling the responsibilities that come with having a “good heart.”
—Patricia A. McCormack, Great Plains Quarterly
Bastien has produced an important work that lays the foundation for making the Blackfoot way of knowing more accessible. Her discussions of Siksikaitsitapi ontology and pedagogy offer culturally appropriate ways of transferring this knowledge through a Siksikaitsitapi-controlled education system. Russel Wright, the late Siksika teacher and elder often said, “We have been studied to death. It is time we start studying ourselves back to life.” He would have been proud of Betty Bastien’s study.
—Gerald T. Contay, Histoire social/Social History
A highly significant description of traditional religion and epistemology within the Blackfoot culture written by a member of this cultural community. Many books of Native American and/or First Nations religions are little more than condescending presentations of “mythology” with little to no cultural context. Ms. Bastien’s work is the opposite, and manages to present a worldview that is radically different than the mainstream Western one with dignity and complexity.
—Conan Van Der Crom, GoodReads