By Coral Davenport, Nov. 25, 2020
WASHINGTON — The owners and operators of more than half a million diesel pickup trucks have been illegally disabling their vehicles’ emissions control technology over the past decade, allowing excess emissions equivalent to 9 million extra trucks on the road, a new federal report has concluded.
The practice, described in a report by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Civil Enforcement, has echoes of the Volkswagen scandal of 2015, when the automaker was found to have illegally installed devices in millions of diesel passenger cars worldwide — including about half a million in the United States — designed to trick emissions control monitors.
But in this case no single corporation is behind the subterfuge; it is the truck owners themselves who are installing illegal devices, which are typically manufactured by small companies. That makes it much more difficult to measure the full scale of the problem, which is believed to affect many more vehicles than the 500,000 or so estimated in the report.
In terms of the pollution impact in the United States, “This is far more alarming and widespread than the Volkswagen scandal,” said Drew Kodjak, executive director of the International Council on Clean Transportation, the research group that first alerted the E.P.A. of the illegal Volkswagen technology. “Because these are trucks, the amount of pollution is far, far higher,” he said.
The E.P.A. focused just on devices installed in heavy pickup trucks, such as the Chevrolet Silverado and the Dodge Ram 2500, about 15 percent of which appear to have defeat devices installed. But such devices — commercially available and marketed as a way to improve vehicle performance — almost certainly have been installed in millions of other vehicles.
The report found “significant amounts of excess air pollution caused by tampering” with diesel pickup truck emissions controls. The technology is essentially an at-home version of the factory-installed “defeat devices” embedded into hundreds of thousands of vehicles in the United States by Volkswagen, which was forced to pay $14.7 billion in the U.S. to settle claims stemming from the scandal.
- Gift Subscriptions to The Times, Cooking and Games.
The report said “diesel tuners” will allow the trucks to release more than 570,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide, a pollutant linked to heart and lung disease and premature death, over the lifetime of the vehicles. That is more than ten times the excess nitrogen oxide emissions attributed to the factory-altered Volkswagens sold domestically.
The report also found that the altered pickup trucks will emit about 5,000 excess tons of industrial soot, also known as particulate matter, which is linked to respiratory diseases and higher death rates for Covid-19 patients.
“A global respiratory pandemic is the worst time to find out that there is this massive cheating by the makers of these devices,” said John Walke, an expert in air pollution law at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, noting recent studies linking higher levels of particulate matter pollution to higher rates of Covid-19.
“That is an astronomically high level of smog-forming pollution,” he added. “It’s happening at ground level where people are breathing the fumes. And if the problem extends to other vehicles it’s almost unimaginable what the health impact will be.”
The E.P.A.’s Office of Civil Enforcement, which is largely staffed with career civil servants, has been conducting the investigation into diesel tuners for about five years, since it discovered the cheating by Volkswagen. An E.P.A. official familiar with the report, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record, said it represents a significant milestone in the ongoing investigation.
The report was completed last week, though the E.P.A. has not publicized it or issued a news release, which stands in contrast to the media blitz assembled by the Obama-era agency for the Volkswagen investigation. In this instance, word got out after Evan Belser, the deputy director of the office’s Air Enforcement Division, emailed a copy of the report to the heads of three state air pollution control organizations.
A spokesman for the E.P.A., James Hewitt, initially said Wednesday that he was unfamiliar with the report. In a statement emailed after he was informed of it, Mr. Hewitt said, “Under our National Compliance Initiative, in FY 2020, E.P.A., resolved more civil tampering and aftermarket defeat device cases (31) that prevented more motor vehicle emissions (14.6 million pounds) than in any prior year in the agency’s history. Additionally, E.P.A. has assessed more in civil penalties, criminal fines, and restitution under this administration than the first four years of the Obama administration.”
The report studied only diesel pickup trucks weighing between 8,500 pounds and 14,000 pounds, but E.P.A. analysts believe the cheating has spread across American garages and highways.
“One reason it is difficult to estimate the full extent of tampering nationwide is that the Air Enforcement Division has reason to believe this conduct occurs within most or all categories of vehicles and engines, including commercial trucks, passenger vehicles, pickup trucks, motorcycles, forestry equipment and agricultural equipment,” the report concluded.
“The aftermarket defeat device problem is huge,” said Phillip Brooks, a former E.P.A. emissions investigator who worked on the diesel tuner investigation and the Volkswagen case. “A lot of people just don’t understand what the problem is — your average person buys a vehicle and says, it’s my vehicle, I can do what I want with it. They may not even be aware that these devices are illegal.”
“But,” he continued, “the real question is impact. If 10 people do it, there’s no impact. But these are numbers that are meaningful for air quality.”
“This is not a great way to express how to be a free American, but there are a lot of people out there who think that way,” Mr. Brooks concluded.
Retailers generally sell the illegal defeat devices online and in public, the report said, but “operate in a secretive manner such that the nature and extent of their operations are not reflected in their business records.”
The E.P.A. investigators found at least 28 different companies involved with the manufacturing of at least 45 diesel tuners. The report does not name the companies because, it says, E.P.A.’s investigation of the matter is ongoing.
A crackdown on the diesel-tuner market would be far more difficult than pursuing a single company like Volkswagen. “There’s a lot of small businesses in play; it’s more difficult to enforce than the one big global automaker,” said Mr. Kodjak of the International Council on Clean Transportation. “Amazon sells diesel tuning equipment. You can retune your engine for $400.”
“Not all of these are illegal, by any means,” he added. “A lot of them are mom-and-pop places.”
Over the course of its investigation, the E.P.A. has shut down some manufacturers: Earlier this year, the agency reached an $850,000 settlement with Punch It Performance and Tuning, a small Florida company that had been selling illegal diesel tuners online.
According to E.P.A. documents, the settlement was lower “due to their limited financial ability to pay a higher penalty. In order to pay this penalty, Defendants have represented that they will sell residential real estate properties that they purchased with profits made from the manufacture and sale of defeat devices.”
Experts said the findings also point to weaknesses in state and local emissions inspection programs, which are entrusted to make sure cars and trucks comply with environmental law and emissions standards.
Federal funding for state enforcement programs has been flat for more than a decade. The E.P.A.’s budget for state and local implementation of the Clean Air Act has been the same every year since 2004: $228 million.
“There are state and local codes and laws in place to crack down on this,” said Miles Keough, the executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies. “But they are all running on the same small budget.”
At many state and municipal emissions inspections stations, inspectors do not actually test tailpipe emissions, explained Mr. Brooks. Instead, they use computers simply to get readings from a vehicle’s computer.
With a defeat device, he said, “the computer on the truck tells the computer at the emissions station, everything’s fine.”Belching DieselControls on diesel engines have proven easy to override.
‘Rolling Coal’ in Diesel Trucks, to Rebel and Provoke Sept. 4, 2016
Diesel Cheating May Involve Millions Of Pickup Trucks
November 29th, 2020 by Steve Hanley
Capping a 5 year investigation that was triggered by the Volkswagen diesel cheating scandal, the EPA has concluded that more than half a million medium and heavy duty pickup trucks in America powered by diesel engines have been modified by their owners, resulting in 570,000 tons of excess oxides of nitrogen and 5,000 tons of particulate matter being emitted into the atmosphere over the lifetime of the vehicles. The EPA studied only diesel pickup trucks weighing between 8,500 pounds and 14,000 pounds, according to a report by the New York Times.
Courtesy of Chevrolet
“[I]t is difficult to estimate the full extent of tampering nationwide,” the EPA report says. “Air Enforcement Division has reason to believe this conduct occurs within most or all categories of vehicles and engines, including commercial trucks, passenger vehicles, pickup trucks, motorcycles, forestry equipment and agricultural equipment.” The problem is, the emission control systems of most internal combustion engines in operation today are controlled by computer software. Any fool who knows how to code can rewrite that software and then sell the hack to others online or at trade shows. Even Amazon sells them.
“The aftermarket defeat device problem is huge,” says Phillip Brooks, a former E.P.A. emissions investigator who worked on the diesel tuner investigation and the Volkswagen case. “A lot of people just don’t understand what the problem is. Your average person buys a vehicle and says, ‘It’s my vehicle, I can do what I want with it.’ They may not even be aware that these devices are illegal.”
Unlike news about how Volkswagen sold a half million diesel powered cars in the US equipped with software designed to bypass emissions controls, which was trumpeted from the highest levels of government, the latest EPA diesel cheating news slipped out the back door after the report was emailed to the heads of three environmental organizations by Evan Belser, deputy director of the Air Enforcement Division at the EPA’s Office of Civil Enforcement on November 20.
The EPA report estimates 557,478 medium and heavy duty trucks have been fitted with emissions defeat devices. The cumulative effect of the extra pollutants coming from their exhaust pipes is estimated to be equal to the emissions from nearly 10 million diesel pickups that are in full compliance with applicable rules and regulations. The report does not address light duty pickup trucks with diesel engines, which are far more numerous, but there is no reason to believe the owners of those vehicles have not modified them as well.
How come the emissions testing stations in the various states haven’t caught the cheaters? The EPA report estimates there are over 60,000 medium and heavy duty pickups in Texas alone that are out of compliance. The answer is simple. Those testing facilities don’t actually sample tailpipe emissions. Instead, they interrogate the onboard computers installed in the vehicles. The cheating software is programmed to report that all is well, even though it is is not. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Federal funding for state enforcement programs has been flat for more than a decade. The E.P.A.’s budget for state and local implementation of the Clean Air Act has been the same every year since 2004 — $228 million. “There are state and local codes and laws in place to crack down on this,” Miles Keough, the executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, tells the New York Times. “But they are all running on the same small budget.”
Which is not to say nothing is being done. Earlier this year, the EPA reached an $850,000 settlement with Punch It Performance and Tuning, a small Florida company that had been selling illegal diesel devices online. According to E.P.A. documents, the settlement was lower than it could have been due to the company’s “limited financial ability to pay a higher penalty. In order to pay this penalty, Defendants have represented that they will sell residential real estate properties that they purchased with profits made from the manufacture and sale of defeat devices.”
James Hewitt, a spokesperson for the EPA, told the New York Times on November 25, “Under our National Compliance Initiative, in FY 2020, E.P.A., resolved more civil tampering and aftermarket defeat device cases (31) that prevented more motor vehicle emissions (14.6 million pounds) than in any prior year in the agency’s history. Additionally, E.P.A. has assessed more in civil penalties, criminal fines, and restitution under this administration than the first four years of the Obama administration.”
That last part is clearly political doctrine fed to Mr. Hewitt by party apparatchiks at the EPA. Hewitt may keep his job as a result of toeing the party line while Evan Belser, if he is smart, is busy updating his resume. Senior officials at the EPA were apparently unaware of the report until The Times called looking for a comment. Belser has committed the worst offense possible in the bureaucratic world — making the boss look bad.
Why would 15% of diesel truck owners spend money to disable the pollution controls fitted to their vehicles? It’s complicated. Those controls sap some power and fuel economy. If you are lugging a load of concrete pipe uphill in the Rocky Mountains, you want all the grunt your engine can provide. And if you are paying for your own diesel fuel, you want to get the most miles per gallon possible. Those pollution controls also need regular maintenance, which can be expensive. There are exhaust gas recirculation devices, NOx absorption catalysts, and selective catalytic reduction systems and they all need to be checked, adjusted, repaired, or replaced over the lifetime of a vehicle.
There are also other, more subtle factors at work. Some of these devices allow drivers to envelope those in other vehicles in a cloud of sooty black smoke, a practice known to the Neanderthals doing it as rolling coal. It’s a way of punishing people who drive Teslas and other green weenies who are oh-so-smug about their environmental credentials. For some, driving a jacked up diesel pickup that sounds like the hammers of Hell when the light turns green is a thrill. It’s a way for powerless people to feel powerful. “This is not a great way to express how to be a free American, but there are a lot of people out there who think that way,” Phillip Brooks says.
When Volkswagen did this, people were outraged — rending their garments and demanding the scalps of the company’s leaders. One VW official is still in prison for his role in the scandal. Will there be the same sort of public outcry now that an even worse diesel cheating scandal has been exposed? Probably not. Diesel pickup trucks are the leaders in the competition to be the biggest, boldest, most badass beasts in the asphalt jungle. Many will celebrate their owners’ “in your face” challenge to officialdom. For guidance on how this will all play out, consult your local Zen master.
