It took just two weeks for the government to run out of funds for its $350 billion Paycheck Protection Program, meant to help small businesses struggling with the coronavirus shutdown. Where did that money go? Over the last several days, stories have trickled out about the supposedly small businesses – chains like Ruth’s Chris steakhouse and burger giant Shake Shack – sweeping up the funding, leaving those who actually need it out to dry. But the public outcry was swift and fierce. There may not be nearly enough strings attached to Congressional bailouts, but never underestimate the power of the public. After a thorough roasting, Shake Shack announced it would return its $10 million in funds.
A plurality of all respondents cited a wealth tax as their preferred way to pay for the program.
A sign warns residents to take steps to contol the coronavirus outbreak at the entrance to the Manhattan Bridge in Brooklyn on March 19, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Victor J. Blue/Getty Images)
A majority of Americans—including over half of Republican respondents—support a monthly $2,000 universal basic income check to help defray the effects of the ongoing coronavirus outbreak on the U.S. economy, according to new polling from Data for Progress and the Justice Collaborative Institute.
A wealth tax proved most popular among all respondents in a follow-up question presenting options for paying for the universal basic income (UBI) policy.
“UBI and taxing the rich: two ideas whose time has come,” tweeted historian Rutger Bregman.
According to The Appeal reporting on the results:
Our polling found that 68% of the public prefers receiving a pre-loaded debit card to a deduction on next year’s income tax. This includes a majority of both Democrats (73%) and Republicans (65%).
Imposing a wealth tax (42%) was supported the most from the public, followed by adding to the deficit (35%) and then by using new currency (24%). Republicans preferred adding the deficit the most (42%) and Democrats preferred the wealth tax the most (50%).
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who has been at the forefront of efforts to provide UBI to everyone in the U.S. during the pandemic, said on Twitter that the polling reflects a changing national mood on the benefit.
“A majority of Americans know what I’ve been saying from the start of this: one-time payments to a portion of the population simply aren’t enough to get us through this crisis,” tweeted Tlaib.
Tlaib introduced with Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) the Automatic BOOST to Communities (ABC) Act on Thursday.
The bill would provide “a $2,000 payment using BOOST debit cards to every person in America as critical relief during the COVID-19 crisis, followed by $1,000 recurring monthly payments for one year after the end of the crisis to help our country and families recover.”
“The ABC Act provides immediate relief to those in need—regardless of their immigration status—and ensures that relief lasts the duration of the pandemic,” Jayapal said in a statement. “We’re in an unprecedented public health and economic crisis and the American people desperately need Congress to take this bold action.”Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
The lone watchdog on a congressional committee formed to oversee the Trump administration’s handling of a multi-trillion-dollar coronavirus bailout package demanded Wednesday that the Federal Reserve release to the public both the names of corporations receiving taxpayer bailout money and details on how the funds are being used.
“The public deserves to know which companies are receiving taxpayer-backed lending through the Fed and on what terms, and to be able to monitor what those companies do after receiving taxpayer support,” Bharat Ramamurti, thus far the only person who has been appointed to the newly created Congressional Oversight Commission, wrote in a letter to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.
“I don’t think we’re in a position where we can just trust corporations to do the right thing with this money.”
—Bharat Ramamurti, Congressional Oversight CommissionUnder the CARES Act—a nearly 900-page stimulus package President Donald Trump signed into law last month—the Fed was given sweeping control over hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money, which the central bank can leverage into trillions of dollars in funds to prop up large corporations.
Ramamurti, a former economic adviser to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), expressed concern that the Fed has not committed to releasing key details about transactions involving such an enormous pot of taxpayer money.
“The public deserves a full documentation of how the Fed uses this money—who gets or doesn’t, and on what terms and conditions—to assess whether the Fed is using public money wisely and in accordance with Congress’ goals in the CARES Act,” Ramamurti wrote in his letter, which can be read in full at the bottom of this story.
“It would undermine public confidence in the Fed for it to provide taxpayer-backed support to a company without the public ever finding out who that company is and what exactly the company received,” Ramamurti added.
Ramamurti’s demands come as watchdog groups continue to raise alarm about the lack of oversight measures in place to prevent Trump and members of his administration from using coronavirus stimulus money for political purposes or personal enrichment.
As Common Dreams reported, Trump last week abruptly fired an official who was appointed by a group of U.S. inspectors general to head the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), another oversight panel established by the CARES Act.
“Clearly he’s planning to corrupt the $2 trillion in spending Congress just approved, whether it’s by steering the money to political favorites, negotiating more favorable terms with certain parties or punishing his enemies with a failure to provide aid,” Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate with Public Citizen, said of the president in a statement last week. “Who could have seen this coming? Literally everyone.”
Critics have also pointed to an “extremely alarming” provision in the CARES Act that allows the Fed to avoid longstanding transparency requirements as it conducts meetings and makes decisions about corporate bailouts amid the ongoing pandemic.
In an interview on MSNBC Wednesday night, Ramamurti—who was appointed to the Congressional Oversight Commission by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)—warned that the CARES Act imposes “more onerous” restrictions on small businesses seeking taxpayer bailout money than large corporations.
“I think it’s particularly disturbing because we’ve seen over the last eight or 10 years that corporate America tends to look out for shareholders and executives first,” said Ramamurti. “We’ve seen an incredible amount of money go into stock buybacks and dividends, and at the same time we’ve seen wages for workers basically stagnate. So I don’t think we’re in a position where we can just trust corporations to do the right thing with this money.”
Read Ramamurti’s full letter:
Dear Chairman Powell:
The Federal Reserve has already announced plans for more than $2 trillion in emergency lending, with potentially trillions more to come. Yet it has not announced what information it will publicly release about individual transactions with private companies through taxpayer-backed lending facilities—including whether it will even release the names of individual beneficiaries.
I write to respectfully request that the Federal Reserve publicly release detailed and timely information about each individual transaction. The public deserves to know which companies are receiving taxpayer-backed lending through the Fed and on what terms, and to be able to monitor what those companies do after receiving taxpayer support.
As you know, Section 4003 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) authorizes the Treasury Secretary to “make loans, loan guarantees, and other investments in support of eligible businesses, States, and municipalities that do not, in the aggregate, exceed $500,000,000,000.” The Treasury can use as much as $500 billion “to make loans and loan guarantees to, and other investments in programs or facilities established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of providing liquidity to the financial system that supports lending to eligible businesses, States, or municipalities.”
The $500 billion from the CARES Act supplements billions in taxpayer money that was already at the Treasury Department’s disposal in the Exchange Stabilization Fund.
In recent weeks, the Treasury Department has used taxpayer money from the Exchange Stabilization Fund and from the CARES Act to support several Fed lending facilities for businesses. Specifically:
- Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility: The Fed, through a special-purpose vehicle (“SPV”), will purchase bonds and syndicated loans, at issuance, from corporations rated investment grade as of March 22, 2020. The Treasury is contributing $50 billion.
- Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility: The Fed, through a SPV, will purchase corporate debt issued by corporations rated investment-grade as of March 22, 2020, on the secondary market, as well as purchase U.S.-listed ETFs that provide exposure to investment-grade corporate bonds. The Treasury is contributing $25 billion. The Primary and Secondary Market Facilities will provide up to $750 billion in total lending.
- Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will make loans of up to three years, fully secured by eligible asset-backed securities. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion to support lending of up to $100 billion.
- Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility: The Fed will lend to U.S. depository institutions, U.S. bank holding companies, or U.S. branches of foreign banks in exchange for collateral that the borrowers purchase from money market mutual funds. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion.
- Commercial Paper Funding Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will purchase three-month, dollar-denominated commercial paper, included asset-backed commercial paper, that is highly rated and issued by any U.S. issuer. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion.
- Main Street New Loan Facility and Expanded Loan Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will purchase 95% participation in new and pre-existing four-year loans make by banks and other lenders to businesses with up to 10,000 employees or up to $2.5 billion in annual revenues. The Treasury is contributing $75 billion to support up to $600 billion in lending.
Collectively, these facilities could pump trillions of dollars into the economy through tens of thousands of individual transactions.
The public deserves a full documentation of how the Fed uses this money—who gets or doesn’t, and on what terms and conditions—to assess whether the Fed is using public money wisely and in accordance with Congress’ goals in the CARES Act. It would undermine public confidence in the Fed for it to provide taxpayer-backed support to a company without the public ever finding out who that company is and what exactly the company received.
Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Fed provide regular public reports (no more than 30 days apart) that provide at least the following information on individual transactions through each taxpayer-backed facility that supports businesses:
- The identity of the borrower, including the name of the legal entity and any information the Fed collects about the beneficial owners of that entity
- The loan terms, including interest rate, covenants, repayment provisions, and time period
- The stated or intended use of the proceeds
- The amount of supporting equity behind the deal
- The full deal documents
- If applicable, any supporting information offered to demonstrate that the beneficiary complies with the CARES Acts’ prohibition on Fed lending to foreign businesses and to companies controlled by top Executive Branch officials, Members of Congress, and their families.
In addition, I request that the Fed provide the following information for transactions under specific facilities:
Primary Market and Secondary Market Credit Facilities
- The CUSIP
- The bond rating and the identity of the ratings agency providing the rating
- For purchases of shares in a syndicated loan, the identities of other syndicated loan participants
- For ETF purchases, the underlying portfolio holdings of the ETF
Main Street New Loan and Expanded Loan Facilities
- The identity of the “Eligible Lender” (the bank that makes the initial loan)
- The text of the attestations offered by both the Eligible Lender and the Eligible Borrower
- Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility
- The total collateral amount for the entire securitization
- The underlying loan data for the securitization (the loan collateral supporting the securitization), including the identity of the borrowers in the case of corporate and commercial real estate loans
- The supporting credit ratings and the identity of the rating agencies
- The identities of the securitization issuers and arrangers, and the total fees they get from selling the entire securitization (including the junior tranches not bought by the Fed)
Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility
- The specific collateral supporting the loan
- The latest Form N-MFP for the borrower at the time of the loan
Thank you for your prompt consideration.
Member, Congressional Oversight Commission
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.