Best Complete Streets Policies

The National Complete Streets Coalition (NCSC) previously identified 10 elements of a comprehensive Complete Streets policy to help communities develop and implement policies and practices that ensure streets are safe for people of all ages and abilities, balance the needs of different modes, and support local land uses, economies, cultures, and natural environments.

But since it first began over a decade ago, the Complete Streets movement has evolved to focus far more on implementation and equity. In response to these changes, the Coalition updated and revised the Complete Streets policy framework to require more accountability from jurisdictions and provisions that account for the needs of the most vulnerable users. The 10 revised policy elements are based on decades of collective expertise in transportation planning and design, created in consultation with NCSC’s steering committee members and a group of national stakeholders consisting of engineers, planners, researchers, and advocates.

The elements serve as a national model of best practices that can be implemented in nearly all types of Complete Streets policies at all levels of governance. For communities considering a Complete Streets policy, this resource serves as a model; for communities with an existing Complete Streets policy, this resource provides guidance on areas for improvements.

An ideal Complete Streets policy includes the following:

  1. Vision and intent: Includes an equitable vision for how and why the community wants to complete its streets. Specifies need to create complete, connected, network and specifies at least four modes, two of which must be biking or walking.
  2. Diverse users: Benefits all users equitably, particularly vulnerable users and the most underinvested and underserved communities.
  3. Commitment in all projects and phases: Applies to new, retrofit/reconstruction, maintenance, and ongoing projects.
  4. Clear, accountable expectations: Makes any exceptions specific and sets a clear procedure that requires high-level approval and public notice prior to exceptions being granted.
  5. Jurisdiction: Requires interagency coordination between government departments and partner agencies on Complete Streets.
  6. Design: Directs the use of the latest and best design criteria and guidelines and sets a time frame for their implementation.
  7. Land use and context sensitivity: Considers the surrounding community’s current and expected land use and transportation needs.
  8. Performance measures: Establishes performance standards that are specific, equitable, and available to the public.
  9. Project selection criteria: Provides specific criteria to encourage funding prioritization for Complete Streets implementation.
  10. Implementation steps: Includes specific next steps for implementation of the policy.

The best Complete Streets policy in the country is…

Mark your calendar! On Wednesday, May 8, 2019 we’re unveiling our ranking of the best Complete Streets policies of 2018. For an indepth look at how policies fared this year—and how our grading has changed—join us for a webinar on Thursday, May 16 at 1:00 p.m. ET.

To date, there have been more that 1,400 policies passed nationwide, including 66 policies that were passed in 2018 and which are ranked in The Best Complete Streets Policies of 2018. But this is the first time we’re using our updated framework that elevates implementation and equity to grade new Complete Streets policies.

While policies have steadily gotten stronger (and scored higher) since we first started ranking policies in 2012, this reworked framework better reflects the need to translate policy into practice and helps makes sure that everyone in a community benefits from Complete Streets. See which policies stood out when we release the rankings on May 8.

Join us for a webinar on Thursday, May 16 from 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. ET. Representatives from three of the communities with high scoring policies will join us to share their experiences and answer your questions. This event is free, but registration is required.

Communities that passed Complete Streets policies in 2018:

Huntsville, AL
Fairfield, CT
Madison, CT
Neptune Beach, FL
Columbus, GA
Gwinnett, GA
Des Moines, IA
Coeur d’Alene, ID
Plymouth, IN
Covington, LA
Lafayette, LA
Abington, MA
Amherst, MA
Auburn, MA
Beckett, MA
Belmont, MA
Bolton, MA
Boxborough, MA
Carlisle, MA
Concord, MA
Erving, MA
Goshen, MA
Hanover, MA
Haverhill, MA
Ipswich, MA
Lynnfield, MA
Marblehead, MA
Marion, MA
Mashpee, MA
Millbury, MA
Milton, MA
Newburyport, MA
Quincy, MA
Walpole, MA
Anne Arundel County, MD
Baltimore, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Ocean City, MD
State of Maryland, MD
Berkley, MI
Cape Giradeau, MO
Monnett, MO
Salem, MO
Brevard, NC
Ralston, NE
Berkeley Heights, NJ
Leonia, NJ
Milltown, NJ
Pennsville, NJ
Roselle Park, NJ
Scotch Plains, NJ
Chateaugay, NY
Chazy, NY
Elmira, NY
Lockport, NY
Port Chester, NY
Village of Nyack, NY
Cleveland Heights, OH
Etna, PA
Millvale, PA
Central Falls, RI
Park City, UT
Kalispel, WA
Tenino, WA
East Central Wisconsin, WI
Milwaukee, WI


Also coming soon:

Our colleagues at Transportation for America are releasing their own report, Repair Priorities, which sheds light on how much states are spending on repair vs. new roads and how policy can get the nation back on track. The report will be released during Infrastructure Week on Tuesday, May 14. Join them for a webinar on Wednesday, May 15  at 3 p.m. ET for a closer look at the findings.